Search run analysis for @disinfoindex from Sat, February 11, 2023 at 12:45:49 -0800 (logged in)

Info

This page shows how Twitter rearranges replies, hiding some of them. Each table below shows a tweet from @disinfoindex and noteworthy replies to that tweet.

Each reply tweet was re-ranked by a formula designed to determine whether a reply is on-topic and good quality. (In this case, the re-ranking was done using the "formula1" algorithm).

Then, the revised ranking was compared with how Twitter ordered the tweet replies in the page. The revised ranking was used to select tweets that Twitter seems to have shown higher than they should have been. Those tweets are listed in the "Anomalous elevated tweets" section in each table.

Likewise, the revised ranking was used to select tweets that Twitter seems to have shown lower than they should have been. Those tweets are in the "Anomalous suppressed/hidden tweets" section in each table. That section contains both tweet replies that were suppressed (shown lower than they should have been) and hidden.

The "Other hidden tweets" in each table has additional hidden tweets, those that weren't ranked highly in the revised ranking.

Note: a hidden tweet is one that's hidden behind the "Show more replies" link at the end of the reply page. Few probably click that link, and the account that was replied to might not see those hidden tweets on their "Notifications" page depending on their settings.

Hidden tweets are highlighted in light red. Each tweet is followed by three orders: the original order (as shown by Twitter), the rank order (as determined by the revised ranking; lower rankings are better), and the date order (earlier tweets have a lower order).

Some tweets are put even lower down, into an "AbusiveQuality" section. Those are highlighted in light purple.

Note that Twitter only shows around a maximum of 200 replies, even if there are hundreds more. For instance, assume that "Number of replies" is "194 of 1841 (reached end)", "Available" is 10%, and "Hidden" is 0%. That means the tweet was listed as having 1841 replies, but a maximum of 194 were retrieved: Twitter wouldn't show any more. The "reached end" means that the app scrolled until no more replies were available. The "Available" column has the percentage (in this case 194/1841 as a percentage ). In cases like this, the "Hidden" column isn't reliable because it wasn't possible to scroll the list of replies low enough to reach the hidden section. The closer the "Available" column is to 100%, the more reliable is the "Hidden" column.

@disinfoindex tweeted on 01/12/23 07:08:55: Exciting news GDI is currently seeking in-country partners to collaborate with us on our Media Market Risk Assessment projects. Projects to-date have covered over 20 countries, and are planned to expand to another 20. Learn more & join us: https://bit.ly/3Gzufbx
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Worse 4 of 3 (reached end) 133% 0% 100%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
  • Bet $5 on Eagles-Chiefs & Get $200 In Bonus Bets Instantly w/ DraftKings Claim Your $200 21+ only, T&Cs apply. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    [original: #3, ranking: #1, date: #1] From @outkickbets on 12/31/69 04:00:00
  • It's interesting how those listed as "least risky sites" ran with a known fake Russian collusion story for 2+ years. Top of the risky list published an accurate story those on the least risky list called disinformation.
    [original: #2, ranking: #2, date: #4] From @randomdeplorab1 on 02/11/23 09:43:16
  • LET'S BRING MORE FREINDS AND FAMILLY!$LET'S BRING MORE FREINDS AND FAMILLY!$ABX #AIBOX LET'S BE PART OF THIS HUGE AND FUTURE AI PROJECT $ABX #AIRBOX LET'S BE PART OF THIS HUGE AND FUTURE AI PROJECT $ABX #AIRBOX Twitter: @airboxapp Tg:
    [original: #4, ranking: #3, date: #2] From @splendymustyx on 01/20/23 07:54:51
  • [original: #1, ranking: #4, date: #3] From @michael34759245 on 02/11/23 12:27:50
show 
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1624324318200053763, from: @michael34759245 (UNKNOWN) on 02/11/23 12:27:50(LOW,0,,) [empty]]
[tweet: 1624464097394712580, from: @randomdeplorab1 (UNKNOWN) on 02/11/23 09:43:16(LOW,0,,) It's interesting how those listed as "least risky sites" ran with a known fake Russian collusion story for 2+ years.   Top of the risky list published an accurate  story those on the least risky list called disinformation.]
[tweet: 0, from: @outkickbets (UNKNOWN) on 12/31/69 04:00:00(LOW,,9,1) Bet $5 on Eagles-Chiefs & Get $200 In Bonus Bets Instantly w/ DraftKings  Claim Your $200   21+ only, T&Cs apply. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER]
[tweet: 1616464282106880002, from: @splendymustyx (UNKNOWN) on 01/20/23 07:54:51(ABUSIVE,0,,) LET'S BRING MORE FREINDS AND FAMILLY!$LET'S BRING MORE FREINDS AND FAMILLY!$ABX #AIBOX  LET'S BE PART OF THIS HUGE AND FUTURE AI PROJECT $ABX #AIRBOX  LET'S BE PART OF THIS HUGE AND FUTURE AI PROJECT $ABX #AIRBOX  Twitter: @airboxapp  Tg:]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
Bet $5 on Eagles-Chiefs & Get $200 In Bonus Bets Instantly w/ DraftKings

Claim Your $200 

21+ only, T&Cs apply. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
 ranking=12.577053739738673 from {coleman=0.42, cos=0, smog=0.3, jac=0.38, kincaid=0.09, pop=3.14, numsent=3, flesch=1.06, ari=0.07, lix=0, time=2, numword=2, fog=0.14}
 orders: orig=3, rank=1, date=1
It's interesting how those listed as "least risky sites" ran with a known fake Russian collusion story for 2+ years. 

Top of the risky list published an accurate  story those on the least risky list called disinformation. 


 ranking=11.785298812098628 from {coleman=0.67, cos=0, smog=1.08, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.39, numsent=2, flesch=1.3, ari=0.54, lix=0.05, time=0.5, numword=3, fuzzy=1.3, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=4
LET'S BRING MORE FREINDS AND FAMILLY!$LET'S BRING MORE FREINDS AND FAMILLY!$ABX #AIBOX

LET'S BE PART OF THIS HUGE AND FUTURE AI PROJECT $ABX #AIRBOX

LET'S BE PART OF THIS HUGE AND FUTURE AI PROJECT $ABX #AIRBOX

Twitter: @airboxapp

Tg:
 ranking=8.532786363636363 from {coleman=0.52, cos=0, smog=0.3, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.21, caps=-3.0, numsent=3, flesch=1.15, ari=0.25, lix=0, time=1.5, numword=3, fuzzy=1, fog=0.23}
 orders: orig=4, rank=3, date=2

 ranking=-2.0 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=1, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=1, rank=4, date=3
@disinfoindex tweeted on 11/08/22 09:55:08: Despite recent initiatives by the digital advertising industry to tackle disinformation, GDI continues to see a range of ad tech vendors helping to fund disinformation content related to election integrity. See examples in GDI's latest disinfo ads study: https://bit.ly/3FYZoGp
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Worse 4 of 2 (reached end) 200% 0% 50%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
  • You just declared it disnfo with no reasoning, evidence or logic behind it. It is no more disinformation than what you are writing. Don't try it, we will hold your feet to the fire.
    [original: #3, ranking: #3, date: #4] From @demoniality on 11/08/22 10:23:09
  • Well isn't that actually what they want.
    [original: #4, ranking: #4, date: #3] From @ikonix360 on 11/08/22 09:58:40
show 
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1590038526896541696, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 09:48:20(HIGH,7,10,1) GDI estimates that the 40 U.S. news websites on which election integrity disinformation narratives are most frequently published generate at least $42.7m per year in digital advertising revenue.  This revenue is generated through ad tech partnerships: http://bit.ly/3NQKUdz]
[tweet: 1590040236188311552, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 09:55:08(HIGH,0,0,0) Despite recent initiatives by the digital advertising industry to tackle disinformation, GDI continues to see a range of ad tech vendors helping to fund disinformation content related to election integrity.  See examples in GDI's latest disinfo ads study: https://bit.ly/3FYZoGp]
[tweet: 1590047285760921601, from: @demoniality (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 10:23:09(LOW,0,,) You just declared it disnfo with no reasoning, evidence or logic behind it. It is no more disinformation than what you are writing. Don't try it, we will hold your feet to the fire.]
[tweet: 1590041124366077954, from: @ikonix360 (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 09:58:40(LOW,,1,) Well isn't that actually what they want.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
Despite recent initiatives by the digital advertising industry to tackle disinformation, GDI continues to see a range of ad tech vendors helping to fund disinformation content related to election integrity.

See examples in GDI's latest disinfo ads study: https://bit.ly/3FYZoGp
 ranking=48.209399733591965 from {coleman=0.88, smog=1.47, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.72, jrw=0.5, numsent=2, flesch=1.75, ari=0.73, lix=0.99, time=1.5, numword=3, fuzzy=33.35, fog=0.86}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=2
GDI estimates that the 40 U.S. news websites on which election integrity disinformation narratives are most frequently published generate at least $42.7m per year in digital advertising revenue.

This revenue is generated through ad tech partnerships: http://bit.ly/3NQKUdz
 ranking=19.725665915019604 from {pop=3.83, coleman=0.97, numsent=2, flesch=1.73, cos=1.21, smog=1.59, ari=0.76, lix=0.99, time=2, numword=3, kincaid=0.68, fog=0.99}
 orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=1
You just declared it disnfo with no reasoning, evidence or logic behind it. It is no more disinformation than what you are writing. Don't try it, we will hold your feet to the fire.
 ranking=10.58211619717338 from {coleman=0.45, numsent=3, flesch=1.2, cos=0.39, smog=0.85, ari=0.19, lix=0, time=0.5, numword=3, jac=0.38, kincaid=0.24, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=3, rank=3, date=4
Well isn't that actually what they want.
 ranking=6.180338847226612 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.03, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=0.98, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1, numword=0, fuzzy=1.3, fog=0.13}
 orders: orig=4, rank=4, date=3
@disinfoindex tweeted on 11/08/22 09:48:20: GDI estimates that the 40 U.S. news websites on which election integrity disinformation narratives are most frequently published generate at least $42.7m per year in digital advertising revenue. This revenue is generated through ad tech partnerships: http://bit.ly/3NQKUdz
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 2 of 1 (reached end) 200% 0% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show 
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1590038526896541696, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 09:48:20(HIGH,0,0,0) GDI estimates that the 40 U.S. news websites on which election integrity disinformation narratives are most frequently published generate at least $42.7m per year in digital advertising revenue.  This revenue is generated through ad tech partnerships: http://bit.ly/3NQKUdz]
[tweet: 1590040236188311552, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 09:55:08(HIGH,4,7,2) Despite recent initiatives by the digital advertising industry to tackle disinformation, GDI continues to see a range of ad tech vendors helping to fund disinformation content related to election integrity.  See examples in GDI's latest disinfo ads study: https://bit.ly/3FYZoGp]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
GDI estimates that the 40 U.S. news websites on which election integrity disinformation narratives are most frequently published generate at least $42.7m per year in digital advertising revenue.

This revenue is generated through ad tech partnerships: http://bit.ly/3NQKUdz
 ranking=44.84097914021946 from {coleman=0.97, smog=1.59, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.68, jrw=0.5, numsent=2, flesch=1.73, ari=0.76, lix=0.99, time=2, numword=3, fuzzy=29.15, fog=0.99}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
Despite recent initiatives by the digital advertising industry to tackle disinformation, GDI continues to see a range of ad tech vendors helping to fund disinformation content related to election integrity.

See examples in GDI's latest disinfo ads study: https://bit.ly/3FYZoGp
 ranking=19.59896405035912 from {coleman=0.88, cos=1.21, smog=1.47, kincaid=0.72, pop=3.59, numsent=2, flesch=1.75, ari=0.73, lix=0.99, time=1, numword=3, fuzzy=1.45, fog=0.86}
 orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
@disinfoindex tweeted on 11/08/22 09:29:25: In the lead up to the U.S. 2022 midterms GDI has been tracking ad-funded disinformation across a range of U.S. online news websites. What did we find? Read our brief to about the adversarial narrative trends and the profits being made off of them:
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 2 of 1 (reached end) 200% 0% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show 
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1590038526896541696, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 09:48:20(HIGH,7,10,1) GDI estimates that the 40 U.S. news websites on which election integrity disinformation narratives are most frequently published generate at least $42.7m per year in digital advertising revenue.  This revenue is generated through ad tech partnerships: http://bit.ly/3NQKUdz]
[tweet: 1590040236188311552, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 09:55:08(HIGH,4,7,2) Despite recent initiatives by the digital advertising industry to tackle disinformation, GDI continues to see a range of ad tech vendors helping to fund disinformation content related to election integrity.  See examples in GDI's latest disinfo ads study: https://bit.ly/3FYZoGp]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
GDI estimates that the 40 U.S. news websites on which election integrity disinformation narratives are most frequently published generate at least $42.7m per year in digital advertising revenue.

This revenue is generated through ad tech partnerships: http://bit.ly/3NQKUdz
 ranking=19.857429578290613 from {coleman=0.97, cos=0.95, smog=1.59, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.68, pop=3.83, numsent=2, flesch=1.73, ari=0.76, lix=0.99, time=2, numword=3, fog=0.99}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
Despite recent initiatives by the digital advertising industry to tackle disinformation, GDI continues to see a range of ad tech vendors helping to fund disinformation content related to election integrity.

See examples in GDI's latest disinfo ads study: https://bit.ly/3FYZoGp
 ranking=19.711453915663025 from {coleman=0.88, cos=0.57, smog=1.47, kincaid=0.72, pop=3.59, numsent=2, flesch=1.75, ari=0.73, lix=0.99, time=1, numword=3, fuzzy=2.2, fog=0.86}
 orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
@disinfoindex tweeted on 11/03/22 08:24:46: "It’s a disinformation peddlers paradise." Current regulatory approaches to Big Tech that are even close to becoming law were formulated before TikTok's rise. Here's how TikTok will test the DSA, and why it needs to be a global regulatory focus:
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Worse 2 of 1 (reached end) 200% 0% 100%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
  • Disinformation checkers pushing the disinformation. State your source of funding.
    [original: #1, ranking: #1, date: #1] From @demoniality on 11/08/22 10:23:52
  • The goal of @DisinfoIndex is to demonitize and deplatform conservative voices. They are even trying to redefine the word "disinformation".
    [original: #2, ranking: #2, date: #2] From @agamemnonriva on 11/09/22 05:50:13
show 
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1590047467487182849, from: @demoniality (UNKNOWN) on 11/08/22 10:23:52(LOW,,1,1) Disinformation checkers pushing the disinformation. State your source of funding.]
[tweet: 1590340987301552130, from: @agamemnonriva (UNKNOWN) on 11/09/22 05:50:13(LOW,0,,) The goal of @DisinfoIndex is to demonitize and deplatform conservative voices.  They are even trying to redefine the word "disinformation".]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
Disinformation checkers pushing the disinformation. State your source of funding.
 ranking=14.527433760512297 from {coleman=1.28, cos=0.55, smog=0.85, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.56, pop=1.95, numsent=2, flesch=1.76, ari=0.71, lix=0.11, time=2, numword=1, fuzzy=0.9, fog=0.5}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
The goal of @DisinfoIndex is to demonitize and deplatform conservative voices.  They are even trying to redefine the word "disinformation".
 ranking=11.544074499068232 from {coleman=0.8, cos=0.52, smog=1.17, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.5, numsent=2, flesch=1.59, ari=0.44, lix=0.05, time=1, numword=1, fuzzy=1.4, fog=0.72}
 orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
@disinfoindex tweeted on 10/18/22 10:46:16: Why should companies at #AWNewYork pay attention? Disinformation creates a risk of harms to individuals, communities and institutions. It also exposes brands to reputation damage & can undermine the public stances taken by many brands against hate: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 2 of 1 (reached end) 200% 0% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show 
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1582427859100237825, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 10/18/22 10:46:16(HIGH,0,0,0) Why should companies at  #AWNewYork pay attention?   Disinformation creates a risk of harms to individuals, communities and institutions.   It also exposes brands to reputation damage & can undermine the public stances taken by many brands against hate: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3]
[tweet: 1582433398647558144, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 10/18/22 11:08:17(HIGH,1,3,) By partnering with disinformation websites, these ad tech vendors are allowing the monetisation of content that infringes their own publisher supply quality policies.  GDI found ad funding going to anti-LGBTQ+, anti-Muslim, anti-democratic disinfo & more: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
Why should companies at  #AWNewYork pay attention?
 
Disinformation creates a risk of harms to individuals, communities and institutions.
 
It also exposes brands to reputation damage & can undermine the public stances taken by many brands against hate: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3
 ranking=43.18141443840139 from {coleman=0.81, smog=1.25, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.53, jrw=0.5, numsent=3, flesch=1.58, ari=0.53, lix=0.08, time=2, numword=3, fuzzy=28.7, fog=0.73}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
By partnering with disinformation websites, these ad tech vendors are allowing the monetisation of content that infringes their own publisher supply quality policies.

GDI found ad funding going to anti-LGBTQ+, anti-Muslim, anti-democratic disinfo & more: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3
 ranking=16.76066766735626 from {coleman=0.9, cos=0.16, smog=1.4, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.59, pop=2.2, numsent=2, flesch=1.62, ari=0.67, lix=0.99, time=1, numword=3, fuzzy=1, fog=0.83}
 orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
@disinfoindex tweeted on 10/18/22 10:36:13: Marketing & tech leaders are gathering at #AWNewYork. What critical topic must be on the agenda? Ad tech's disinformation problem. Where to start? The ad tech companies featured in GDI's latest report are all @advertisingweek Gold or Corporate partners https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 2 of 1 (reached end) 200% 0% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show 
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1582427859100237825, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 10/18/22 10:46:16(HIGH,1,3,1) Why should companies at  #AWNewYork pay attention?   Disinformation creates a risk of harms to individuals, communities and institutions.   It also exposes brands to reputation damage & can undermine the public stances taken by many brands against hate: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3]
[tweet: 1582433398647558144, from: @disinfoindex (UNKNOWN) on 10/18/22 11:08:17(HIGH,1,3,) By partnering with disinformation websites, these ad tech vendors are allowing the monetisation of content that infringes their own publisher supply quality policies.  GDI found ad funding going to anti-LGBTQ+, anti-Muslim, anti-democratic disinfo & more: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
By partnering with disinformation websites, these ad tech vendors are allowing the monetisation of content that infringes their own publisher supply quality policies.

GDI found ad funding going to anti-LGBTQ+, anti-Muslim, anti-democratic disinfo & more: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3
 ranking=18.829123036248667 from {coleman=0.9, cos=1.03, smog=1.4, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.59, pop=2.2, numsent=2, flesch=1.62, ari=0.67, lix=0.99, time=1, numword=3, fuzzy=2.2, fog=0.83}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=2
Why should companies at  #AWNewYork pay attention?
 
Disinformation creates a risk of harms to individuals, communities and institutions.
 
It also exposes brands to reputation damage & can undermine the public stances taken by many brands against hate: https://bit.ly/3yPzuk3
 ranking=18.78320013694296 from {coleman=0.81, cos=0.71, smog=1.25, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.53, pop=2.64, numsent=3, flesch=1.58, ari=0.53, lix=0.08, time=2, numword=3, fuzzy=1.5, fog=0.73}
 orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=1