This page shows how Twitter rearranges replies, hiding some of them. Each table below shows a tweet from @broderick and noteworthy replies to that tweet.
Each reply tweet was re-ranked by a formula designed to determine whether a reply is on-topic and good quality. (In this case, the re-ranking was done using the "formula1" algorithm).
Then, the revised ranking was compared with how Twitter ordered the tweet replies in the page. The revised ranking was used to select tweets that Twitter seems to have shown higher than they should have been. Those tweets are listed in the "Anomalous elevated tweets" section in each table.
Likewise, the revised ranking was used to select tweets that Twitter seems to have shown lower than they should have been. Those tweets are in the "Anomalous suppressed/hidden tweets" section in each table. That section contains both tweet replies that were suppressed (shown lower than they should have been) and hidden.
The "Other hidden tweets" in each table has additional hidden tweets, those that weren't ranked highly in the revised ranking.
Note: a hidden tweet is one that's hidden behind the "Show more replies" link at the end of the reply page. Few probably click that link, and the account that was replied to might not see those hidden tweets on their "Notifications" page depending on their settings.
Hidden tweets are highlighted in light red. Each tweet is followed by three orders: the original order (as shown by Twitter), the rank order (as determined by the revised ranking; lower rankings are better), and the date order (earlier tweets have a lower order).
Some tweets are put even lower down, into an "AbusiveQuality" section. Those are highlighted in light purple.
Note that Twitter only shows around a maximum of 200 replies, even if there are hundreds more. For instance, assume that "Number of replies" is "194 of 1841 (reached end)", "Available" is 10%, and "Hidden" is 0%. That means the tweet was listed as having 1841 replies, but a maximum of 194 were retrieved: Twitter wouldn't show any more. The "reached end" means that the app scrolled until no more replies were available. The "Available" column has the percentage (in this case 194/1841 as a percentage ). In cases like this, the "Hidden" column isn't reliable because it wasn't possible to scroll the list of replies low enough to reach the hidden section. The closer the "Available" column is to 100%, the more reliable is the "Hidden" column.
| @broderick tweeted on 02/16/23 04:02:35: It’s kind of a bummer of seriously the MCU is taking Kang. No spoilers, but the pacing of Quantumania is completely screwed up because of how much build up there is for him. They are so desperate to make him Scarier Than Thanos when they should go the other way. | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 2 of 2 (reached end) | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626371497206992896, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 04:02:36 (HIGH,,16,,3096) They seem to be trying to make him kind of a Darth Vader figure. They literally do a boots-first hallway walking shot with him in Quantumania. But it doesn’t really fit the vibe. I feel like he’d be better as an aloof weirdo. Kinda like how we see him in Loki.]
[tweet: 1626388469407748100, from: @mikeradnor39 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 05:10:02 (HIGH,,1,,106) They treated him like Voldemort for the first half of the movie doing everything they could to avoid saying his name]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
They seem to be trying to make him kind of a Darth Vader figure. They literally do a boots-first hallway walking shot with him in Quantumania. But it doesn’t really fit the vibe. I feel like he’d be better as an aloof weirdo. Kinda like how we see him in Loki.
ranking=19.273441715472853 from {coleman=0.34, cos=0.53, smog=0.65, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.11, pop=3.47, numsent=5, flesch=1.04, ari=0.07, lix=0, time=2, numword=5, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.28}
orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
They treated him like Voldemort for the first half of the movie doing everything they could to avoid saying his name
ranking=9.235655754563332 from {coleman=0.56, cos=0, smog=1.08, kincaid=0.39, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.24, ari=0.54, lix=0.05, time=1, numword=2, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.62}
orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/16/23 02:06:47: Every couple years, I try and take a month where I watch every piece of live footage that exists on the internet of pre-breakup At The Drive-In. As a way to recharge spirituality. | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bad | 11 of 8 (reached end) | 137% | 27% | 0% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626345719706550277, from: @klobstar (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 02:20:10 (HIGH,,1,1,217) I remember my mom telling me this was the worst music she had ever heard, which is what she said each time she heard a new song]
[tweet: 1626346108136964103, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 02:21:42 (HIGH,,4,,166) In her defense, the only way I can describe ATDR live performances are a band battling their own music and instruments to try and finish a whole song]
[tweet: 1626389950303440898, from: @ciaela (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 05:15:55 (HIGH,0,,,966) Man, I was really into ATDI back in the MySpace era, my livejournal username was an ATDI song, and it absolutely did not even matter that the lyrics to most of their songs were ???????? I was just so into this energy.]
[tweet: 1626359612965371906, from: @huwfoster (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 03:15:22 (HIGH,,,1,79) Their appearance on Jools Holland when they *clearly* can’t stand each other is incredible.]
[tweet: 1626382235103383552, from: @forest_sounds (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:45:16 (HIGH,,2,,30) https://youtube.com/watch?v=6JpzZLcm6_s… but the cut away to Robbie Williams at the end is just Golden.]
[tweet: 1626349864240963585, from: @kevind04 (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 02:36:38 (HIGH,,2,,146) Did you see when they shocked/annoyed Robbie Williams on Jools Holland?]
[tweet: 1626382457854472192, from: @forest_sounds (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:46:09 (HIGH,,1,,37) it's the greatest]
[tweet: 1626348189128306690, from: @fawst (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 02:29:59 (HIGH,0,,,76) I KNEW I knew his voice! Didn’t realize he was the singer for The Mars Volta and I’ve never heard these guys before this video. That’s awesome.]
[tweet: 1626372988978225154, from: @darrensusin (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:08:31 (HIGH,0,,,48) Legendary]
[tweet: 1626344893919420418, from: @tomdavenport (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 02:16:53 (HIGH,0,,,93) Were you cool enough to be on the original atdi forum?]
[tweet: 1626373149024559106, from: @slaven_max (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:09:09 (HIGH,0,,,37) The Jools Holland is]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
In her defense, the only way I can describe ATDR live performances are a band battling their own music and instruments to try and finish a whole song
ranking=13.010455084314161 from {coleman=0.49, cos=0.72, smog=1.08, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.57, pop=2.08, numsent=1, flesch=1.37, ari=0.65, lix=0.08, time=1.64, numword=2, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.71}
orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=3
I remember my mom telling me this was the worst music she had ever heard, which is what she said each time she heard a new song
ranking=12.201971932149705 from {coleman=0.31, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.45, pop=1.95, numsent=1, flesch=1.21, ari=0.48, lix=0.05, time=1.82, numword=2, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.62}
orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=2
Man, I was really into ATDI back in the MySpace era, my livejournal username was an ATDI song, and it absolutely did not even matter that the lyrics to most of their songs were ???????? I was just so into this energy.
ranking=10.831264794580315 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.98, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.4, numsent=2, flesch=1.26, ari=0.39, lix=0, time=0.19, numword=4, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.56}
orders: orig=3, rank=3, date=11
Their appearance on Jools Holland when they *clearly* can’t stand each other is incredible.
ranking=10.066339826430827 from {coleman=0.8, cos=0, smog=1.08, kincaid=0.34, pop=1.61, numsent=1, flesch=1.31, ari=0.53, lix=0.07, time=1.1, numword=1, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.57}
orders: orig=4, rank=4, date=6
I KNEW I knew his voice! Didn’t realize he was the singer for The Mars Volta and I’ve never heard these guys before this video. That’s awesome.
ranking=9.801104470562294 from {coleman=0.42, cos=0, smog=0.62, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.12, numsent=3, flesch=1.08, ari=0.1, lix=0, time=1.46, numword=2, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.25}
orders: orig=8, rank=5, date=4
Legendary
ranking=8.089963466596076 from {coleman=1.87, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=1.02, numsent=1, flesch=2.48, ari=1.08, lix=0.99, time=0.91, numword=0, fuzzy=0.9, fog=2.03}
orders: orig=9, rank=6, date=7
Were you cool enough to be on the original atdi forum?
ranking=7.501872557505166 from {coleman=0.37, numsent=1, flesch=1.28, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.13, lix=0, time=2, numword=1, kincaid=0.3, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.41}
orders: orig=10, rank=7, date=1
Did you see when they shocked/annoyed Robbie Williams on Jools Holland?
ranking=7.204356633847163 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.13, pop=1.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.05, ari=0.24, lix=0, time=1.28, numword=1, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.2}
orders: orig=6, rank=8, date=5
https://youtube.com/watch?v=6JpzZLcm6_s…
but the cut away to Robbie Williams at the end is just Golden.
ranking=7.047452752728281 from {coleman=0.33, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.16, pop=1.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.04, ari=0.15, lix=0, time=0.55, numword=1, fuzzy=0.9, fog=0.26}
orders: orig=5, rank=9, date=9
it's the greatest
ranking=0.6656585441963092 from {coleman=0.83, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.15, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.23, ari=0.28, lix=0.1, time=0.37, numword=0, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.04}
orders: orig=7, rank=10, date=10
The Jools Holland is
ranking=-1.2360147727272734 from {coleman=0.47, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.04, numsent=1, flesch=1.03, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=0.73, numword=0, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.08}
orders: orig=11, rank=11, date=8
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/16/23 11:55:35: Current phase 4 and 5 movies ranking best to worst: -Spider-Man: No Way Home -Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness -Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings -Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania -Black Panther: Wakanda Forever -Black Widow -Eternals -Thor: Love and Thunder | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 2 of 1 (reached end) | 200% | 0% | 0% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626309333809041410, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 11:55:35 (HIGH,0,0,0,0) Current phase 4 and 5 movies ranking best to worst: -Spider-Man: No Way Home -Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness -Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings -Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania -Black Panther: Wakanda Forever -Black Widow -Eternals -Thor: Love and Thunder]
[tweet: 1626316239579537411, from: @jjackyliang (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 12:23:01 (HIGH,0,,,69) Doctor Strange was horrible IMO. Should have renamed it Doctor Strange and the Scarlett Witch]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
Current phase 4 and 5 movies ranking best to worst:
-Spider-Man: No Way Home
-Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
-Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings
-Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania
-Black Panther: Wakanda Forever
-Black Widow
-Eternals
-Thor: Love and Thunder
ranking=47.06401059120082 from {coleman=0.58, smog=1.4, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.89, jrw=0.5, numsent=1, flesch=1.57, ari=1.08, lix=0.99, time=2, numword=4, fuzzy=31.55, fog=1.04}
orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
Doctor Strange was horrible IMO. Should have renamed it Doctor Strange and the Scarlett Witch
ranking=9.315636207219402 from {coleman=0.75, numsent=2, flesch=1.14, cos=0.79, smog=0.3, ari=0.35, lix=0.06, time=1, numword=1, kincaid=0.16, fuzzy=1.65, fog=0.15}
orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/16/23 08:04:29: We’ll be forced to use AI customer service reps, AI lawyers, AI doctors, AI news outlets. Meanwhile, those who got rich from making it will brag about their human therapist or their kid’s human teacher. That’s the real danger. Not a glorified autocomplete flirting with you. | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bad | 38 of 26 (reached end) | 146% | 21% | 5% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626251171919798274, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:28 (HIGH,95,622,3,22008) We, Americans, need regulation now or we will be left behind. We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights. It is a waste of time to worry it an AI wants to live or not. We are barreling towards a very scary future.]
[tweet: 1626251174369189888, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:28 (HIGH,95,564,1,24669) We know how this will work. The rich will tell us how amazing and powerful AI is. That it will make our lives more convenient in the short-term and more bland and limited in the long-term. And 10 years from now we’ll find out there are anti-AI private schools.]
[tweet: 1626251177129115651, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:29 (HIGH,0,0,0,0) We’ll be forced to use AI customer service reps, AI lawyers, AI doctors, AI news outlets. Meanwhile, those who got rich from making it will brag about their human therapist or their kid’s human teacher. That’s the real danger. Not a glorified autocomplete flirting with you.]
[tweet: 1626267904932028416, from: @jessietweeting (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:10:57 (HIGH,,10,,6587) AI will augment workers in those fields. Humans will always be involved in the process. However, if someone can’t get access to something like education due to limitations like environment (say village in rural continent) then even just an AI teacher is a win by creating access.]
[tweet: 1626427398257364992, from: @lowbrowfae (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 07:44:43 (HIGH,,,1,6) Teleconferencing has been a thing for well more than forty years. If the imperial core wanted to bring education and healthcare to the impoverished colonies, it would have done that a long time ago.]
[tweet: 1626252595525296129, from: @swgaspar (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:10:07 (HIGH,1,3,7,5713) You do realize that the entire IRS could be run with AI.]
[tweet: 1626253268946141185, from: @itdbitd (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:12:48 (HIGH,,24,,689) That would require a system not based on letting rich people cheat on their taxes.]
[tweet: 1626281087982010369, from: @shabatu33 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:03:20 (HIGH,1,16,,2307) The "confession booth" in the movie "THX1138" nailed it back in the 1970s. A picture of Icon Jesus spewing randomly generated feel-good phrases. And we laughed at the notion back then...]
[tweet: 1626257569428779009, from: @drkaz (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:29:53 (HIGH,,1,,3049) This is all navel-gazing, but an example counter to your future is that computer-controlled transmissions outperform humans. Additionally, people are highly variable. Where you see a human teacher besting AI, someone's kid whose current teacher is bad at their job sees benefit.]
[tweet: 1626273676856381440, from: @benjaminlowe (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:33:53 (HIGH,1,21,2,3182) What you’re describing is what’s wrong with capitalism, not technology advancing.]
[tweet: 1626293497052504065, from: @nickstarrmusic (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:52:39 (HIGH,,10,1,524) They’re intimately related, unless you plan to pause technological advancement while we extricate capitalism from human society.]
[tweet: 1626348575713300481, from: @docgotham (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 02:31:31 (HIGH,,1,,456) "We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights." There's the tough part! What do you suggest, specifically?]
[tweet: 1626305612526104578, from: @lordpelagius (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 11:40:47 (HIGH,,4,1,288) and thus the economic system will collapse as companies will suddenly not need to employ 40 to 50% of the population and either they rise up and French revolution the rich or universal income has to happen or ai gets banned directly or indirectly i guess]
[tweet: 1626340854829920256, from: @fuck_fascist (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 02:00:50 (HIGH,,1,,34) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626342795144314882, from: @pasquinadepost (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 02:08:33 (HIGH,0,,,139) Thank God.]
[tweet: 1626315522340970504, from: @huetchen2 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 12:20:10 (HIGH,,,1,828) @threadreaderapp unroll pls.]
[tweet: 1626275888265322500, from: @earcwelder (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:42:41 (HIGH,0,,,1144) Counterpoint: no we won’t]
[tweet: 1626256234004217860, from: @olivia_p_walker (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:24:35 (HIGH,,1,,5166) Great point.]
[tweet: 1626262720289947648, from: @jimbootz (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:50:21 (HIGH,,1,,1823) They've gotten employees to dutifully automate themselves out of a job for them.]
[tweet: 1626294600271900675, from: @coryhannington (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:57:02 (HIGH,0,,,384) That is the plan.]
[tweet: 1626521852926648327, from: @umm_rit_ (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 02:00:03 (HIGH,0,,,1) This makes no sense whatsoever. First of all, if services and care like medical care and science can indeed be improved by using computers and AI, then why the must we not improve our quality of lives? Yes it's true that the rich benefit first, but ultimately they trickle down.]
[tweet: 1626255294392336384, from: @psycholojuice (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:20:51 (HIGH,0,,,4629) Yes, this guy gets it]
[tweet: 1626379150616596480, from: @dannykauf (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:33:00 (HIGH,,2,1,122) Why is that a danger? AI doctors will be better than real doctors in short order and bring down the cost of medical care.]
[tweet: 1626388566992384001, from: @fredlysays (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 05:10:25 (HIGH,,1,,27) AI will Analyze X-rays, photos of skin, retinas, inside mouth, a multitude of bodily sounds, ultrasound images, lab results, all these and more. Yeah, it’s gonna be a great improvement, doctorwise.]
[tweet: 1626252866749956097, from: @bcostain (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:11:12 (HIGH,1,40,,5357) Human Provided Services (HPS) are a luxury item]
[tweet: 1626262062019084289, from: @rollandtrees (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:47:44 (HIGH,0,,,2729) #YangGang @AndrewYang]
[tweet: 1626279287564419072, from: @zpostfacto (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:56:11 (HIGH,,3,1,1086) In this brave new world, the rich will be able to call their banker on the phone or speak directly with a maitre d to reserve a table, while the rest of us will have to conduct these transactions through an impersonal computer interface!]
[tweet: 1626363656375259137, from: @mandylibrary (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 03:31:26 (HIGH,0,,,34) Or with a super neurotic chatbot!]
[tweet: 1626276823301496837, from: @tonytribby (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:46:24 (HIGH,0,,,559) Yeah, we must be clear, "AI" isn't doing anything. Stable Diffusion or ChatGPT can be great tools to enhance your individual experience of life... or you can weaponize them against other humans. But in either case that's the human's choice.]
[tweet: 1626277651739561988, from: @stoopsmith206 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:49:41 (HIGH,,1,,93) And literally that has been the choice always with any tool or advancement. Same can be said about chainsaws.]
[tweet: 1626456787619815425, from: @perksplus0001 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:41:30 (HIGH,,1,,22) Wait, so we'll get better-than-human assistance and the rich will just get human? That's poggers dude.]
[tweet: 1626376382052982784, from: @user1478 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:22:00 (HIGH,0,,,92) Of course AI-produced things will be worse than human-produced things. And a mass-produced shirt will be worse than a handmade one. That doesn't mean that we need to regulate looms.]
[tweet: 1626276648562880513, from: @stoopsmith206 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:45:42 (HIGH,,3,1,410) This is just capitalism. You just described capitalism. That's the problem. Not the tech. chatGPT is an incredibly powerful writing tool (which is how I use it) and like any tool, as you mentioned, should have parameters. But all of the other shit you mentioned is capitalism.]
[tweet: 1626278264305238016, from: @stoopsmith206 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:52:07 (HIGH,,,1,78) You can go wild and use a chainsaw without knowing how to use it safely or get training and use it for your job or you can use it like you're John Kane in DOOM and use it maliciously. The choice on how to use tools has always been inherent in the human condition.]
[tweet: 1626356523965513729, from: @__mehhhh (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 03:03:06 (HIGH,,2,1,73) Whoever discovers the ruins of our civilization a millennia from now will marvel at how our wildest imaginations dreamt up precisely how we would fall and yet we did not have the smarts or the will to prevent it all from becoming reality.]
[tweet: 1626356853583265794, from: @__mehhhh (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 03:04:24 (HIGH,0,,,9) For a time, it was good]
[tweet: 1626318548615168001, from: @gdreaper7 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 12:32:12 (LOW,,1,,37) They'll tell us we don't need to teach kids history because they can just ask ChatGPT, thus we'll have an entire generation who won't know anything about history they didn't ask a robot about. They'll be the easiest generation to indoctrinate since before the internet.]
[tweet: 0, from: @placeholder_handle (UNKNOWN) on 12/31/69 04:00:00 (LOW,0,0,0,0) [empty]]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
We’ll be forced to use AI customer service reps, AI lawyers, AI doctors, AI news outlets. Meanwhile, those who got rich from making it will brag about their human therapist or their kid’s human teacher.
That’s the real danger. Not a glorified autocomplete flirting with you.
ranking=41.879756505206416 from {coleman=0.62, smog=0.78, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.3, jrw=0.5, numsent=4, flesch=1.29, ari=0.32, lix=0.05, time=1.85, numword=4, fuzzy=27.35, fog=0.36}
orders: orig=3, rank=1, date=4
We, Americans, need regulation now or we will be left behind. We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights. It is a waste of time to worry it an AI wants to live or not. We are barreling towards a very scary future.
ranking=24.87450872133156 from {coleman=0.37, cos=0.75, smog=0.92, jac=0.48, kincaid=0.27, jrw=0.39, pop=7.35, numsent=4, flesch=1.21, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.95, numword=5, fuzzy=1.6, fog=0.46}
orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=2
We know how this will work. The rich will tell us how amazing and powerful AI is. That it will make our lives more convenient in the short-term and more bland and limited in the long-term. And 10 years from now we’ll find out there are anti-AI private schools.
ranking=21.111165394590735 from {coleman=0.37, cos=0.68, smog=0.78, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.15, pop=7.26, numsent=4, flesch=1.07, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=1.9, numword=4, fog=0.36}
orders: orig=2, rank=3, date=3
AI will augment workers in those fields. Humans will always be involved in the process. However, if someone can’t get access to something like education due to limitations like environment (say village in rural continent) then even just an AI teacher is a win by creating access.
ranking=19.589806711997685 from {coleman=0.64, cos=0.94, smog=1.08, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.49, jrw=0.38, pop=3, numsent=3, flesch=1.47, ari=0.45, lix=0.08, time=1.37, numword=4, fuzzy=1.7, fog=0.57}
orders: orig=4, rank=4, date=13
This is just capitalism. You just described capitalism.
That's the problem.
Not the tech. chatGPT is an incredibly powerful writing tool (which is how I use it) and like any tool, as you mentioned, should have parameters. But all of the other shit you mentioned is capitalism.
ranking=17.554248577184097 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0.11, smog=0.9, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.28, pop=2.4, numsent=5, flesch=1.28, ari=0.26, lix=0.05, time=1.22, numword=4, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.45}
orders: orig=33, rank=5, date=16
and thus the economic system will collapse as companies will suddenly not need to employ 40 to 50% of the population and either they rise up and French revolution the rich or universal income has to happen
or ai gets banned directly or indirectly i guess
ranking=17.544215271498565 from {coleman=0.55, cos=0.62, smog=1.65, jac=0.41, kincaid=1.01, pop=2.57, numsent=1, flesch=1.67, ari=1.15, lix=0.99, time=0.79, numword=4, fog=1.19}
orders: orig=13, rank=6, date=24
Whoever discovers the ruins of our civilization a millennia from now will marvel at how our wildest imaginations dreamt up precisely how we would fall and yet we did not have the smarts or the will to prevent it all from becoming reality.
ranking=17.38620365925412 from {coleman=0.55, cos=0, smog=1.53, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.93, pop=2.2, numsent=1, flesch=1.61, ari=1.08, lix=0.99, time=0.48, numword=4, fuzzy=1.5, fog=1.1}
orders: orig=35, rank=7, date=30
In this brave new world, the rich will be able to call their banker on the phone or speak directly with a maitre d to reserve a table, while the rest of us will have to conduct these transactions through an impersonal computer interface!
ranking=16.822958171071477 from {coleman=0.49, cos=0.15, smog=1.4, jac=0.48, kincaid=0.85, pop=2.4, numsent=1, flesch=1.48, ari=1.06, lix=0.99, time=1, numword=4, fuzzy=0.5, fog=1.07}
orders: orig=27, rank=8, date=20
This is all navel-gazing, but an example counter to your future is that computer-controlled transmissions outperform humans.
Additionally, people are highly variable. Where you see a human teacher besting AI, someone's kid whose current teacher is bad at their job sees benefit.
ranking=16.48027652221787 from {coleman=0.66, cos=0.96, smog=0.94, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.36, jrw=0.39, pop=0.7, numsent=3, flesch=1.33, ari=0.41, lix=0.07, time=1.53, numword=4, fuzzy=1.3, fog=0.47}
orders: orig=9, rank=9, date=10
This makes no sense whatsoever.
First of all, if services and care like medical care and science can indeed be improved by using computers and AI, then why the must we not improve our quality of lives?
Yes it's true that the rich benefit first, but ultimately they trickle down.
ranking=15.847078363586094 from {coleman=0.53, cos=0.57, smog=1.08, jac=0.48, kincaid=0.36, numsent=3, flesch=1.28, ari=0.39, lix=0.06, time=0.06, numword=5, fuzzy=2.5, fog=0.58}
orders: orig=21, rank=10, date=38
They’re intimately related, unless you plan to pause technological advancement while we extricate capitalism from human society.
ranking=15.45871684752444 from {coleman=1.11, cos=0.38, smog=1.53, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.83, pop=3.22, numsent=1, flesch=1.95, ari=0.85, lix=0.99, time=0.9, numword=1, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.95}
orders: orig=11, rank=11, date=22
You can go wild and use a chainsaw without knowing how to use it safely or get training and use it for your job or you can use it like you're John Kane in DOOM and use it maliciously.
The choice on how to use tools has always been inherent in the human condition.
ranking=15.383022065592057 from {coleman=0.34, cos=0.66, smog=0.98, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.48, pop=1.61, numsent=2, flesch=1.26, ari=0.49, lix=0.06, time=1.06, numword=5, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.65}
orders: orig=34, rank=12, date=19
What you’re describing is what’s wrong with capitalism, not technology advancing.
ranking=14.733606662815903 from {coleman=1.08, cos=0, smog=1.4, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.58, pop=4.01, numsent=1, flesch=1.72, ari=0.65, lix=0.1, time=1.32, numword=1, fuzzy=0.4, fog=1.07}
orders: orig=10, rank=13, date=14
Yeah, we must be clear, "AI" isn't doing anything. Stable Diffusion or ChatGPT can be great tools to enhance your individual experience of life... or you can weaponize them against other humans. But in either case that's the human's choice.
ranking=14.648035396518992 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0.53, smog=1.01, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.31, numsent=3, flesch=1.27, ari=0.34, lix=0, time=1.16, numword=4, fuzzy=1.5, fog=0.52}
orders: orig=29, rank=14, date=17
The "confession booth" in the movie "THX1138" nailed it back in the 1970s. A picture of Icon Jesus spewing randomly generated feel-good phrases.
And we laughed at the notion back then...
ranking=13.87093174470867 from {pop=3.56, coleman=0.57, numsent=3, flesch=1.19, cos=0, smog=0.75, ari=0.27, lix=0.05, time=0.95, numword=3, kincaid=0.23, fog=0.34}
orders: orig=8, rank=15, date=21
AI will Analyze X-rays, photos of skin, retinas, inside mouth, a multitude of bodily sounds, ultrasound images, lab results, all these and more. Yeah, it’s gonna be a great improvement, doctorwise.
ranking=13.581347744557194 from {coleman=0.7, cos=0.56, smog=1.33, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.48, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=1.48, ari=0.48, lix=0.06, time=0.22, numword=3, fuzzy=1.4, fog=0.78}
orders: orig=24, rank=16, date=35
They'll tell us we don't need to teach kids history because they can just ask ChatGPT, thus we'll have an entire generation who won't know anything about history they didn't ask a robot about. They'll be the easiest generation to indoctrinate since before the internet.
ranking=13.54722678227937 from {coleman=0.63, cos=0.12, smog=1.17, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.53, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=1.46, ari=0.55, lix=0.08, time=0.69, numword=4, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.65}
orders: orig=37, rank=17, date=26
"We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights."
There's the tough part! What do you suggest, specifically?
ranking=12.867302741551098 from {coleman=0.56, cos=0.51, smog=0.85, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.24, pop=0.7, numsent=3, flesch=1.25, ari=0.21, lix=0, time=0.53, numword=2, fuzzy=2.2, fog=0.42}
orders: orig=12, rank=18, date=29
That would require a system not based on letting rich people cheat on their taxes.
ranking=12.75028609412634 from {coleman=0.53, cos=0.22, smog=0.3, jac=0.38, kincaid=0.27, pop=3.88, numsent=1, flesch=1.16, ari=0.36, lix=0, time=1.69, numword=1, fuzzy=1.7, fog=0.3}
orders: orig=7, rank=19, date=7
Human Provided Services (HPS) are a luxury item
ranking=12.67568915124389 from {coleman=0.61, cos=0.51, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.41, pop=4.42, numsent=1, flesch=1.5, ari=0.25, lix=0, time=1.74, numword=0, fuzzy=1, fog=0.42}
orders: orig=25, rank=20, date=6
You do realize that the entire IRS could be run with AI.
ranking=12.532872379743221 from {coleman=0.29, cos=1.11, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.15, pop=3.79, numsent=1, flesch=1.05, ari=0.1, lix=0, time=1.79, numword=1, fuzzy=1.75, fog=0.25}
orders: orig=6, rank=21, date=5
Teleconferencing has been a thing for well more than forty years. If the imperial core wanted to bring education and healthcare to the impoverished colonies, it would have done that a long time ago.
ranking=12.354225700119466 from {coleman=0.62, cos=0, smog=1.17, jac=0.48, kincaid=0.42, pop=1.61, numsent=2, flesch=1.35, ari=0.48, lix=0.05, time=0.16, numword=3, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.64}
orders: orig=5, rank=22, date=36
Why is that a danger? AI doctors will be better than real doctors in short order and bring down the cost of medical care.
ranking=12.111942731508186 from {coleman=0.39, cos=1.32, smog=0.69, kincaid=0.22, pop=2.2, numsent=2, flesch=1.15, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=0.27, numword=2, fuzzy=1.4, fog=0.33}
orders: orig=23, rank=23, date=34
They've gotten employees to dutifully automate themselves out of a job for them.
ranking=11.072653943522738 from {coleman=0.69, cos=0, smog=1.25, kincaid=0.44, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.47, ari=0.41, lix=0.08, time=1.43, numword=1, fuzzy=1.9, fog=0.74}
orders: orig=19, rank=24, date=12
Of course AI-produced things will be worse than human-produced things. And a mass-produced shirt will be worse than a handmade one. That doesn't mean that we need to regulate looms.
ranking=10.158231983290792 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.62, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.05, numsent=3, flesch=0.97, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=0.32, numword=3, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.26}
orders: orig=32, rank=25, date=33
And literally that has been the choice always with any tool or advancement.
Same can be said about chainsaws.
ranking=8.779731580170374 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.25, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=1.24, ari=0.27, lix=0, time=1.11, numword=1, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.41}
orders: orig=30, rank=26, date=18
Wait, so we'll get better-than-human assistance and the rich will just get human? That's poggers dude.
ranking=7.8108523107464265 from {coleman=0.48, cos=0.54, smog=0.69, kincaid=0.12, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=1.11, ari=0.11, lix=0, time=0.11, numword=1, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.29}
orders: orig=31, rank=27, date=37
Or with a super neurotic chatbot!
ranking=5.526335276803413 from {coleman=0.54, numsent=1, flesch=1.41, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.14, lix=0.06, time=0.37, numword=0, kincaid=0.33, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.46}
orders: orig=28, rank=28, date=32
For a time, it was good
ranking=3.497244298245614 from {coleman=0.05, numsent=1, flesch=0.84, cos=0, smog=0.3, ari=-0.25, lix=0, time=0.43, numword=0, kincaid=-0.07, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.13}
orders: orig=36, rank=29, date=31
Counterpoint: no we won’t
ranking=2.5620971189086745 from {coleman=0.79, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.27, numsent=1, flesch=1.38, ari=0.26, lix=0.05, time=1.27, numword=0, fuzzy=1, fog=0.73}
orders: orig=17, rank=30, date=15
@threadreaderapp unroll pls.
ranking=1.8251550176972584 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.15, pop=1.61, numsent=1, flesch=1.23, ari=0.04, lix=0, time=0.74, numword=0, fuzzy=1.2, fog=0.04}
orders: orig=16, rank=31, date=25
Great point.
ranking=0.7979695489809976 from {coleman=0.69, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.15, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, ari=0.16, lix=0, time=1.58, numword=0, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.04}
orders: orig=18, rank=32, date=9
#YangGang @AndrewYang
ranking=0.2695592105263154 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.15, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, ari=-0.07, lix=0, time=1.48, numword=0, fuzzy=1.5, fog=0.04}
orders: orig=26, rank=33, date=11
Yes, this guy gets it
ranking=-0.17255105263157922 from {coleman=0.16, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.09, numsent=1, flesch=0.83, ari=-0.19, lix=0, time=1.64, numword=0, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.1}
orders: orig=22, rank=34, date=8
ranking=-1.0 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=2, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
orders: orig=38, rank=35, date=1
Thank God.
ranking=-1.0251776315789476 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.15, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, ari=-0.07, lix=0, time=0.58, numword=0, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.04}
orders: orig=15, rank=36, date=28
That is the plan.
ranking=-1.5101822368421058 from {coleman=0.17, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.11, numsent=1, flesch=0.82, ari=-0.2, lix=0, time=0.85, numword=0, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.08}
orders: orig=20, rank=37, date=23
ranking=-1.6752738720716336 from {pop=0.7, coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=0.64, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
orders: orig=14, rank=38, date=27
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/16/23 08:04:28: We know how this will work. The rich will tell us how amazing and powerful AI is. That it will make our lives more convenient in the short-term and more bland and limited in the long-term. And 10 years from now we’ll find out there are anti-AI private schools. | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 3 of 24 (reached end) | 12% | 0% | 0% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626251171919798274, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:28 (HIGH,95,622,3,22007) We, Americans, need regulation now or we will be left behind. We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights. It is a waste of time to worry it an AI wants to live or not. We are barreling towards a very scary future.]
[tweet: 1626251174369189888, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:28 (HIGH,0,0,0,0) We know how this will work. The rich will tell us how amazing and powerful AI is. That it will make our lives more convenient in the short-term and more bland and limited in the long-term. And 10 years from now we’ll find out there are anti-AI private schools.]
[tweet: 1626251177129115651, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:29 (HIGH,412,1414,27,283042) We’ll be forced to use AI customer service reps, AI lawyers, AI doctors, AI news outlets. Meanwhile, those who got rich from making it will brag about their human therapist or their kid’s human teacher. That’s the real danger. Not a glorified autocomplete flirting with you.]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
We know how this will work. The rich will tell us how amazing and powerful AI is. That it will make our lives more convenient in the short-term and more bland and limited in the long-term. And 10 years from now we’ll find out there are anti-AI private schools.
ranking=33.329324149025254 from {coleman=0.37, smog=0.78, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.15, jrw=0.5, numsent=4, flesch=1.07, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=1.34, numword=4, fuzzy=20.15, fog=0.36}
orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=2
We, Americans, need regulation now or we will be left behind. We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights. It is a waste of time to worry it an AI wants to live or not. We are barreling towards a very scary future.
ranking=24.63403425188383 from {coleman=0.37, cos=0.4, smog=0.92, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.27, pop=7.35, numsent=4, flesch=1.21, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=2, numword=5, fuzzy=2.1, fog=0.46}
orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=1
We’ll be forced to use AI customer service reps, AI lawyers, AI doctors, AI news outlets. Meanwhile, those who got rich from making it will brag about their human therapist or their kid’s human teacher.
That’s the real danger. Not a glorified autocomplete flirting with you.
ranking=24.210354619100848 from {coleman=0.62, cos=0.68, smog=0.78, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.3, pop=8.35, numsent=4, flesch=1.29, ari=0.32, lix=0.05, time=0.67, numword=4, fuzzy=2.4, fog=0.36}
orders: orig=3, rank=3, date=3
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/16/23 08:04:27: AI will (most likely) not gain sentience in our lifetime. But what it is doing right now is replacing human labor with bad facsimiles, making public communication worse, automating prejudices, strengthening monopolies, and creating new ways to terrorize each other. | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 32 of 24 (reached end) | 133% | 15% | 12% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626251171919798274, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:28 (HIGH,95,622,3,22005) We, Americans, need regulation now or we will be left behind. We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights. It is a waste of time to worry it an AI wants to live or not. We are barreling towards a very scary future.]
[tweet: 1626251174369189888, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:28 (HIGH,95,564,1,24661) We know how this will work. The rich will tell us how amazing and powerful AI is. That it will make our lives more convenient in the short-term and more bland and limited in the long-term. And 10 years from now we’ll find out there are anti-AI private schools.]
[tweet: 1626251177129115651, from: @broderick (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 08:04:29 (HIGH,412,1414,27,283019) We’ll be forced to use AI customer service reps, AI lawyers, AI doctors, AI news outlets. Meanwhile, those who got rich from making it will brag about their human therapist or their kid’s human teacher. That’s the real danger. Not a glorified autocomplete flirting with you.]
[tweet: 1626387022125617152, from: @feild99 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 05:04:17 (HIGH,,4,,240) C'mon. Just like Tesla's self-driving software, it'll get better if it's just allowed to continued to be used as one giant public experiment. Oh, wait...]
[tweet: 1626252469876494336, from: @price_yeah (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:09:37 (HIGH,,7,,3486) In essence - it’s corporate intelligence at work]
[tweet: 1626274167430565892, from: @turbinemagic (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:35:50 (HIGH,,1,1,1983) What do you regulate? Can regulators really curtail the potential pitfalls?]
[tweet: 1626280589224726529, from: @megaphonixmusic (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:01:21 (HIGH,,6,1,415) for person-to-person services, i bet the FTC could issue rules about plainly advertising if something is AI-based using specific and clear language to consumers. and laws could be passed that require the ability to easily opt out of AI bots and speak to a human.]
[tweet: 1626406261167366150, from: @kurtrexcooper (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 06:20:44 (HIGH,,2,,172) Can you have sentience without feelings, which are generated through the whole body and not just the brain?]
[tweet: 1626293110425915392, from: @pdxcharlie97208 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:51:07 (HIGH,,1,,549) The single-most important factor in bestowing the imprimatur of feasibility to disinformation is *repetition*, and bots never sleep.]
[tweet: 1626429680931811328, from: @peterpesce (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 07:53:48 (HIGH,,3,,221) ChatGPT is the logical endgame of social media - a machine trained to eloquently and convincingly spit back at us everything we have said online for the last 10 years. We will be hoisted on our own pittard, high on our own supply, etc metaphors abound!]
[tweet: 1626363283597889537, from: @baorao (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 03:29:57 (HIGH,0,,,302) You're not wrong. But I'd imagine that first sentence is something that will also be said in the hours before it actually does.]
[tweet: 1626376881606909953, from: @pwrhsepat (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:23:59 (HIGH,0,,,157) Sounds like social media]
[tweet: 1626377640973328385, from: @agreen (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 04:27:00 (HIGH,,2,1,1173) This statement is incredibly short sighted.]
[tweet: 1626378251781259265, from: @pmastersstuff (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:29:26 (HIGH,,7,,327) LOL tell us how we're wrong then my dude.]
[tweet: 1626373962899812352, from: @albertlloreta (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:12:23 (HIGH,,7,1,554) Not to mention the terrible feedback loops it will spread! Years and years of Internet junk everywhere.]
[tweet: 1626396405429305348, from: @newtype89a (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 05:41:34 (HIGH,0,,,47) All you gata do is look at this site to see the dangeres of a algorithm based echo chamber.]
[tweet: 1626253710920654848, from: @winjer (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:14:33 (HIGH,,7,,3105) very relevant to what you have said is this, published yesterday by David Chapman (the meaningness guy)]
[tweet: 1626305287383662593, from: @dannygroner (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 11:39:30 (HIGH,0,,,540) Good take.]
[tweet: 1626425943941332993, from: @cameronwilson (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 07:38:57 (HIGH,0,,,1079) sweet :)]
[tweet: 1626376132193923072, from: @haywirewindgod (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 04:21:01 (HIGH,,2,,371) With a listing like that you'd Almost want it to be sentient. So that way you could at least blame it for the way it acts.]
[tweet: 1626462593320890368, from: @warwickgowphoto (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:04:35 (HIGH,0,,,131) Artisanal doctors visits anyone?]
[tweet: 1626329907939708928, from: @javiermarti (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 01:17:20 (HIGH,,1,,294) As I write in my AI book, you're right Ryan, AI has to be watched closely, but the potential upside is huge and could well lead us to utopia: a world of free resources, free energy, free education...we just have to use it/develop it right]
[tweet: 1626462385971286017, from: @warwickgowphoto (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:03:45 (HIGH,0,,,7) There’s enough resources in the world that we could have all of that right now. The fact we don’t tell us enough about how this will play out.]
[tweet: 1626280827297361921, from: @agoldmund (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 10:02:18 (HIGH,,,1,2572) Do you really think we'll get sentient AI in our lifetime? I am older than you so maybe I'll die just before we get there]
[tweet: 1626296117129318400, from: @speedy2041 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 11:03:04 (HIGH,,4,1,583) He said “not gain” sentience in our lifetime.]
[tweet: 1626507365540413447, from: @jbluksy (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:02:29 (HIGH,0,,,14) It was most likely totally sentient the second that Trump was elected and then basically it was tricked into doing the entire Pandemic and all that comes with it and - wait for it - all the lies will soon come out and when they do - these people will blame out of control AI. Fun.]
[tweet: 1626281161021333504, from: @unclepaulemath (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:03:38 (HIGH,,,1,614) You're going for the outrage clicks - and you might even believe most of it - but most of that was already a thing pre-"right now" and the rest is wild hyperbole. The biggest problem, though is you're ignoring what this tech does for poor folks with ideas but no hiring capital.]
[tweet: 1626283289458753536, from: @unclepaulemath (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:12:05 (HIGH,0,,,185) Take ChatGPT and grassroots nonprofits (and small business startups), for example. My nonprofit launch-to-scale timeline shrank by 30-40% because of what it can do - and it'll keep shrinking as I learn how to use it better. That means everything happens faster.]
[tweet: 1626368660242845696, from: @on_a_tangent (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 03:51:19 (LOW,,2,,28) AI won't be as glamorous as science fiction makes it out to be. It will instead be used to weaponize lies and deceipt for the rich and powerful few.]
[tweet: 1626280840908132353, from: @adammantine (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 10:02:21 (LOW,0,,,75) Yawn. This is Doomer and fearmongering stuff. AI is an easy target to gin up fear and drive engagement.]
[tweet: 0, from: @placeholder_handle (UNKNOWN) on 12/31/69 04:00:00 (LOW,0,0,0,0) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626278314120994818, from: @grandmadata (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 09:52:19 (ABUSIVE,0,,,79) It’s becoming a Pet Rock…useless]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
We’ll be forced to use AI customer service reps, AI lawyers, AI doctors, AI news outlets. Meanwhile, those who got rich from making it will brag about their human therapist or their kid’s human teacher.
That’s the real danger. Not a glorified autocomplete flirting with you.
ranking=25.944701896344657 from {coleman=0.62, cos=0.89, smog=0.78, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.3, jrw=0.39, pop=8.35, numsent=4, flesch=1.29, ari=0.32, lix=0.05, time=1.82, numword=4, fuzzy=2.4, fog=0.36}
orders: orig=3, rank=1, date=4
We, Americans, need regulation now or we will be left behind. We need regulations on AI training data, we need new labor laws, we need new copyrights. It is a waste of time to worry it an AI wants to live or not. We are barreling towards a very scary future.
ranking=25.010312180783963 from {coleman=0.37, cos=0.74, smog=0.92, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.27, pop=7.35, numsent=4, flesch=1.21, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.94, numword=5, fuzzy=2.2, fog=0.46}
orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=2
We know how this will work. The rich will tell us how amazing and powerful AI is. That it will make our lives more convenient in the short-term and more bland and limited in the long-term. And 10 years from now we’ll find out there are anti-AI private schools.
ranking=20.759341845333896 from {coleman=0.37, cos=0.36, smog=0.78, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.15, pop=7.26, numsent=4, flesch=1.07, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=1.88, numword=4, fog=0.36}
orders: orig=2, rank=3, date=3
for person-to-person services, i bet the FTC could issue rules about plainly advertising if something is AI-based using specific and clear language to consumers. and laws could be passed that require the ability to easily opt out of AI bots and speak to a human.
ranking=19.15421206525276 from {coleman=0.52, cos=0.33, smog=1.65, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.93, pop=2.84, numsent=1, flesch=1.61, ari=1.05, lix=0.99, time=1.5, numword=4, fuzzy=1.2, fog=1.14}
orders: orig=7, rank=4, date=9
You're going for the outrage clicks - and you might even believe most of it - but most of that was already a thing pre-"right now" and the rest is wild hyperbole.
The biggest problem, though is you're ignoring what this tech does for poor folks with ideas but no hiring capital.
ranking=15.853374802282676 from {coleman=0.46, cos=0.34, smog=0.98, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.46, pop=1.61, numsent=2, flesch=1.27, ari=0.54, lix=0.06, time=1.32, numword=5, fuzzy=0.8, fog=0.62}
orders: orig=27, rank=5, date=12
As I write in my AI book, you're right Ryan, AI has to be watched closely, but the potential upside is huge and could well lead us to utopia: a world of free resources, free energy, free education...we just have to use it/develop it right
ranking=15.484314154418168 from {coleman=0.32, cos=0.56, smog=1.08, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.75, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.37, ari=0.87, lix=0.1, time=1, numword=4, fuzzy=2.4, fog=0.94}
orders: orig=22, rank=6, date=17
It was most likely totally sentient the second that Trump was elected and then basically it was tricked into doing the entire Pandemic and all that comes with it and - wait for it - all the lies will soon come out and when they do - these people will blame out of control AI. Fun.
ranking=13.755844042382822 from {coleman=0.44, cos=0.37, smog=0.85, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.47, numsent=2, flesch=1.24, ari=0.57, lix=0.06, time=0.07, numword=5, fuzzy=1.7, fog=0.61}
orders: orig=26, rank=7, date=32
In essence - it’s corporate intelligence at work
ranking=13.030845665523408 from {coleman=0.98, cos=0, smog=1.08, kincaid=0.52, pop=2.64, numsent=1, flesch=1.69, ari=0.5, lix=0.11, time=1.75, numword=0, fuzzy=2, fog=0.79}
orders: orig=5, rank=8, date=5
Do you really think we'll get sentient AI in our lifetime? I am older than you so maybe I'll die just before we get there
ranking=12.89117206071268 from {coleman=0.33, cos=0.46, smog=0.69, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.17, pop=1.61, numsent=2, flesch=1.08, ari=0.11, lix=0, time=1.44, numword=2, fuzzy=2.3, fog=0.32}
orders: orig=24, rank=9, date=10
The single-most important factor in bestowing the imprimatur of feasibility to disinformation is *repetition*, and bots never sleep.
ranking=12.846449731765702 from {coleman=0.95, cos=0, smog=1.65, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.81, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.9, ari=0.74, lix=0.1, time=1.19, numword=1, fuzzy=1.4, fog=1.05}
orders: orig=9, rank=10, date=14
ChatGPT is the logical endgame of social media - a machine trained to eloquently and convincingly spit back at us everything we have said online for the last 10 years. We will be hoisted on our own pittard, high on our own supply, etc metaphors abound!
ranking=12.837875428568049 from {pop=1.8, coleman=0.54, numsent=2, flesch=1.33, cos=0, smog=1.17, ari=0.55, lix=0.08, time=0.25, numword=4, kincaid=0.48, fog=0.68}
orders: orig=10, rank=11, date=29
What do you regulate? Can regulators really curtail the potential pitfalls?
ranking=12.62474645139616 from {coleman=0.9, cos=0, smog=0.98, kincaid=0.41, pop=1.95, numsent=2, flesch=1.53, ari=0.42, lix=0.09, time=1.63, numword=1, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.66}
orders: orig=6, rank=12, date=7
Take ChatGPT and grassroots nonprofits (and small business startups), for example. My nonprofit launch-to-scale timeline shrank by 30-40% because of what it can do - and it'll keep shrinking as I learn how to use it better.
That means everything happens faster.
ranking=12.598627395221635 from {coleman=0.66, numsent=3, flesch=1.33, cos=0, smog=1.01, ari=0.41, lix=0.08, time=1.25, numword=4, kincaid=0.36, fog=0.52}
orders: orig=28, rank=13, date=13
C'mon. Just like Tesla's self-driving software, it'll get better if it's just allowed to continued to be used as one giant public experiment.
Oh, wait...
ranking=12.556037635638289 from {coleman=0.53, cos=0.18, smog=0.62, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.18, pop=2.08, numsent=3, flesch=1.19, ari=0.15, lix=0, time=0.5, numword=2, fuzzy=1.5, fog=0.24}
orders: orig=4, rank=14, date=25
AI won't be as glamorous as science fiction makes it out to be. It will instead be used to weaponize lies and deceipt for the rich and powerful few.
ranking=12.305627729051057 from {coleman=0.4, cos=0.24, smog=0.98, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.3, pop=1.39, numsent=2, flesch=1.23, ari=0.23, lix=0.06, time=0.88, numword=2, fuzzy=1.7, fog=0.5}
orders: orig=29, rank=15, date=19
He said “not gain” sentience in our lifetime.
ranking=11.632966727339799 from {coleman=0.5, cos=1.42, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.19, pop=2.57, numsent=1, flesch=1.18, ari=0.16, lix=0, time=1.13, numword=0, fuzzy=2.25, fog=0.42}
orders: orig=25, rank=16, date=15
very relevant to what you have said is this, published yesterday by David Chapman (the meaningness guy)
ranking=11.406727528268506 from {coleman=0.67, cos=0, smog=1.08, kincaid=0.42, pop=2.64, numsent=1, flesch=1.35, ari=0.52, lix=0.08, time=1.69, numword=1, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.58}
orders: orig=17, rank=17, date=6
Not to mention the terrible feedback loops it will spread! Years and years of Internet junk everywhere.
ranking=11.116877713142195 from {coleman=0.69, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.26, pop=2.95, numsent=2, flesch=1.27, ari=0.32, lix=0.05, time=0.82, numword=1, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.41}
orders: orig=15, rank=18, date=20
This statement is incredibly short sighted.
ranking=10.873679579911038 from {coleman=1.03, cos=0, smog=1.08, kincaid=0.33, pop=2.2, numsent=1, flesch=1.41, ari=0.54, lix=0.11, time=0.63, numword=0, fuzzy=1.8, fog=0.79}
orders: orig=13, rank=19, date=23
Yawn. This is Doomer and fearmongering stuff. AI is an easy target to gin up fear and drive engagement.
ranking=10.570332542370904 from {coleman=0.49, numsent=3, flesch=1.2, cos=0.25, smog=0.75, ari=0.11, lix=0, time=1.38, numword=1, kincaid=0.19, fuzzy=1.9, fog=0.34}
orders: orig=30, rank=20, date=11
You're not wrong. But I'd imagine that first sentence is something that will also be said in the hours before it actually does.
ranking=9.93720708131469 from {coleman=0.53, numsent=2, flesch=1.17, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.25, lix=0, time=0.94, numword=2, kincaid=0.22, fuzzy=1.6, fog=0.41}
orders: orig=11, rank=21, date=18
With a listing like that you'd Almost want it to be sentient. So that way you could at least blame it for the way it acts.
ranking=9.57637736111989 from {coleman=0.28, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.13, pop=1.39, numsent=2, flesch=1.01, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=0.75, numword=2, fuzzy=1.4, fog=0.25}
orders: orig=20, rank=22, date=21
It’s becoming a Pet Rock…useless
ranking=9.303766669241483 from {coleman=0.57, numsent=1, flesch=1.51, cos=0, smog=1.08, ari=0.14, lix=0.08, time=1.57, numword=0, kincaid=0.39, fuzzy=2.1, fog=0.9}
orders: orig=32, rank=23, date=8
There’s enough resources in the world that we could have all of that right now.
The fact we don’t tell us enough about how this will play out.
ranking=9.071175836999611 from {coleman=0.36, cos=0.5, smog=0.69, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.18, numsent=2, flesch=1.08, ari=0.17, lix=0, time=0.19, numword=2, fuzzy=1.2, fog=0.34}
orders: orig=23, rank=24, date=30
Can you have sentience without feelings, which are generated through the whole body and not just the brain?
ranking=9.064144830997648 from {coleman=0.65, cos=0.29, smog=0.85, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.33, pop=1.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.2, ari=0.53, lix=0.08, time=0.38, numword=1, fuzzy=0.5, fog=0.48}
orders: orig=8, rank=25, date=27
All you gata do is look at this site to see the dangeres of a algorithm based echo chamber.
ranking=7.303930879767799 from {coleman=0.33, numsent=1, flesch=1.2, cos=0, smog=1.08, ari=0.3, lix=0.05, time=0.44, numword=1, kincaid=0.34, fuzzy=1, fog=0.6}
orders: orig=16, rank=26, date=26
LOL tell us how we're wrong then my dude.
ranking=6.314138579615259 from {coleman=0.21, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=-0.03, pop=2.64, numsent=1, flesch=0.86, ari=-0.07, lix=0, time=0.57, numword=0, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.16}
orders: orig=14, rank=27, date=24
Artisanal doctors visits anyone?
ranking=3.971935057505166 from {coleman=1.28, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.78, numsent=1, flesch=2.09, ari=0.68, lix=0.11, time=0.13, numword=0, fuzzy=1.5, fog=0.59}
orders: orig=21, rank=28, date=31
Sounds like social media
ranking=1.0542124999999998 from {coleman=0.76, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.04, numsent=1, flesch=1.03, ari=0.27, lix=0, time=0.69, numword=0, fuzzy=1.9, fog=0.08}
orders: orig=12, rank=29, date=22
Good take.
ranking=-0.9416250000000002 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.15, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, ari=-0.07, lix=0, time=1.07, numword=0, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.04}
orders: orig=18, rank=30, date=16
ranking=-1.0 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=2, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
orders: orig=31, rank=31, date=1
sweet :)
ranking=-1.43635 from {coleman=0.69, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.16, numsent=1, flesch=0.79, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=0.32, numword=0, fuzzy=0.5, fog=0.02}
orders: orig=19, rank=32, date=28
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/15/23 01:48:51: Here’s a fun game I like to play with boilerplate both-sides headlines. Just invert them and see then how they read: “Officials say risk to humans is low, but contamination from a derailed train killed at least 3,500 fish in the Ohio River” Uh oh! | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worse | 4 of 4 (reached end) | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1625984347848470530, from: @katlaronde (UNKNOWN) on 02/15/23 02:24:12 (HIGH,,2,,667) Oh damn, this is a good tip.]
[tweet: 1626014831739281409, from: @lprobus (UNKNOWN) on 02/15/23 04:25:20 (HIGH,,1,,399) More Than 3,500 Dead Fish in the Ohio River after Toxic Exposion, Officials Estimate Risk to Humans.]
[tweet: 1626002772201193472, from: @zp91pzhaoyu (UNKNOWN) on 02/15/23 03:37:25 (LOW,0,,,118) 是的，他们总是用双面标题报道他们想报道的事情。]
[tweet: 1625983442155630598, from: @rarianrakista (UNKNOWN) on 02/15/23 02:20:36 (LOW,0,,,285) The Ohio River basin wasn't in that good shape to begin with. The more worrisome aspect is that this pollution will just be background noise in a few months. Most damage was done to the Ohio River long, long ago, and has never been cleaned up. https://enviroatlas.epa.gov/enviroatlas/interactivemap/…]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
The Ohio River basin wasn't in that good shape to begin with. The more worrisome aspect is that this pollution will just be background noise in a few months.
Most damage was done to the Ohio River long, long ago, and has never been cleaned up.
https://enviroatlas.epa.gov/enviroatlas/interactivemap/…
ranking=14.234119578827727 from {coleman=0.44, cos=0.75, smog=0.75, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.27, numsent=3, flesch=1.16, ari=0.29, lix=0, time=2, numword=4, fuzzy=0.8, fog=0.39}
orders: orig=4, rank=1, date=1
More Than 3,500 Dead Fish in the Ohio River after Toxic Exposion, Officials Estimate Risk to Humans.
ranking=12.223957965157668 from {coleman=0.54, cos=1.66, smog=1.25, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.49, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.44, ari=0.44, lix=0.05, time=0.5, numword=1, fuzzy=2.1, fog=0.7}
orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=4
Oh damn, this is a good tip.
ranking=6.741990917110544 from {coleman=0.06, cos=0.4, smog=0.3, kincaid=-0.05, pop=1.39, numsent=1, flesch=0.85, ari=-0.22, lix=0, time=1.5, numword=0, fuzzy=1.4, fog=0.14}
orders: orig=1, rank=3, date=2
是的，他们总是用双面标题报道他们想报道的事情。
ranking=1.8408749999999996 from {coleman=2.31, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, ari=1.46, lix=0.1, time=1, numword=0, kincaid=-0.15, fog=0.04}
orders: orig=3, rank=4, date=3
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/15/23 12:54:22: Yeah, I’m convinced, Rhys is absolutely a figment of Joe’s imagination. | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 1 of 1 (reached end) | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1625963776481656849, from: @yungkitty404 (UNKNOWN) on 02/15/23 01:02:27 (HIGH,0,,,159) Should I catch up on this? I didn't watch past season 1]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
Should I catch up on this? I didn't watch past season 1
ranking=6.650470454545454 from {coleman=0.21, numsent=2, flesch=0.92, cos=0, smog=0.3, ari=-0.14, lix=0, time=2, numword=1, kincaid=-0.02, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.12}
orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 02/15/23 09:38:41: The "Ohio media blackout" conspiracy theory and why the news doesn't *feel* like the news anymore https://garbageday.email/p/the-internet-broke-it… | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worse | 1 of 1 (reached end) | 100% | 0% | 100% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1625919794242535424, from: @roundeuro (UNKNOWN) on 02/15/23 10:07:41 (LOW,0,,,64) Legacy/corporate media is dying? Awesome! We’re all pretty tired of their lies, too.]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
Legacy/corporate media is dying? Awesome! We’re all pretty tired of their lies, too.
ranking=9.260443849519126 from {coleman=0.47, numsent=3, flesch=0.97, cos=0.44, smog=0.62, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=2, numword=1, kincaid=-0.01, fuzzy=0.5, fog=0.26}
orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
|
||||
| @broderick tweeted on 11/18/22 08:09:50: Alright, here's where I'll be for now. IG: http://instagram.com/garbageryan Discord: garbageryan#5652 Newsletter: http://garbageday.email Email: ryan@garbageday.email Tumblr: http://garbageday.tumblr.com Mastodon: http://mastodon.social/@ryanbroderick We'll see which ones stick! | ||||
| Status | Number of replies | Available | Suppressed | Hidden |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bad | 3 of 3 (reached end) | 100% | 33% | 0% |
| Anomalous elevated replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
| Other hidden replies: | ||||
|
|
||||
show _sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1593655838597677056, from: @jasonumd (UNKNOWN) on 11/18/22 09:22:15 (HIGH,0,,,undefined) Not sure about that email one]
[tweet: 1593711742391050243, from: @the_jew (UNKNOWN) on 11/18/22 01:04:23 (HIGH,0,,,undefined) I'm having decision paralysis trying to decide what mastodon server to signup on. Looks like yours is private/close any others you would recommend?]
[tweet: 1593638842208223234, from: @trobertson (UNKNOWN) on 11/18/22 08:14:43 (HIGH,0,,,undefined) Really wish you could change your handle here back to ryanhatesthis]
rankingFunctionName=formula1
_rankedtweets=
I'm having decision paralysis trying to decide what mastodon server to signup on. Looks like yours is private/close any others you would recommend?
ranking=9.910742262565943 from {coleman=0.72, numsent=2, flesch=1.45, cos=0.33, smog=1.08, ari=0.4, lix=0, time=0.67, numword=2, kincaid=0.41, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.6}
orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=3
Really wish you could change your handle here back to ryanhatesthis
ranking=8.815327102959712 from {coleman=0.74, numsent=1, flesch=1.13, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.43, lix=0, time=2, numword=1, kincaid=0.19, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.41}
orders: orig=3, rank=2, date=1
Not sure about that email one
ranking=7.347037615220348 from {coleman=0.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.13, cos=0.65, smog=0.3, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=1.34, numword=0, kincaid=0.13, fuzzy=2.3, fog=0.13}
orders: orig=1, rank=3, date=2
|
||||