Search run analysis for @sparklingruby from Fri, February 17, 2023 at 13:47:06 -0800 (logged in)

Info

This page shows how Twitter rearranges replies, hiding some of them. Each table below shows a tweet from @sparklingruby and noteworthy replies to that tweet.

Each reply tweet was re-ranked by a formula designed to determine whether a reply is on-topic and good quality. (In this case, the re-ranking was done using the "formula1" algorithm).

Then, the revised ranking was compared with how Twitter ordered the tweet replies in the page. The revised ranking was used to select tweets that Twitter seems to have shown higher than they should have been. Those tweets are listed in the "Anomalous elevated tweets" section in each table.

Likewise, the revised ranking was used to select tweets that Twitter seems to have shown lower than they should have been. Those tweets are in the "Anomalous suppressed/hidden tweets" section in each table. That section contains both tweet replies that were suppressed (shown lower than they should have been) and hidden.

The "Other hidden tweets" in each table has additional hidden tweets, those that weren't ranked highly in the revised ranking.

Note: a hidden tweet is one that's hidden behind the "Show more replies" link at the end of the reply page. Few probably click that link, and the account that was replied to might not see those hidden tweets on their "Notifications" page depending on their settings.

Hidden tweets are highlighted in light red. Each tweet is followed by three orders: the original order (as shown by Twitter), the rank order (as determined by the revised ranking; lower rankings are better), and the date order (earlier tweets have a lower order).

Some tweets are put even lower down, into an "AbusiveQuality" section. Those are highlighted in light purple.

Note that Twitter only shows around a maximum of 200 replies, even if there are hundreds more. For instance, assume that "Number of replies" is "194 of 1841 (reached end)", "Available" is 10%, and "Hidden" is 0%. That means the tweet was listed as having 1841 replies, but a maximum of 194 were retrieved: Twitter wouldn't show any more. The "reached end" means that the app scrolled until no more replies were available. The "Available" column has the percentage (in this case 194/1841 as a percentage ). In cases like this, the "Hidden" column isn't reliable because it wasn't possible to scroll the list of replies low enough to reach the hidden section. The closer the "Available" column is to 100%, the more reliable is the "Hidden" column.

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 01:04:53: "It was a contractor." "No that was a different contractor." "And then there was a separate pilot." "....That didn't feed into the predictive modeling."
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 4 of 6 (reached end) 66% 0% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626688198968594446, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:01:03 (HIGH,1,7,1,370) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626688370133856257, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:01:44 (HIGH,,6,1,410) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626689160785367040, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:04:53 (HIGH,0,0,0,0) "It was a contractor."  "No that was a different contractor."  "And then there was a separate pilot."  "....That didn't feed into the predictive modeling."]
[tweet: 1626689540638363665, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:06:23 (HIGH,1,8,,563) .@AGJeffLandry Please get in touch with me. I have strong reason to believe this pilot was put into production and not only used for operational purposes.  I do not believe the statement below is accurate.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
"It was a contractor."

"No that was a different contractor."

"And then there was a separate pilot."

"....That didn't feed into the predictive modeling."
 ranking=23.319050869565217 from {coleman=0.59, smog=0.9, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.24, jrw=0.5, numsent=5, flesch=1.31, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=1, numword=2, fuzzy=10.55, fog=0.62}
 orders: orig=3, rank=1, date=3
.@AGJeffLandry Please get in touch with me. I have strong reason to believe this pilot was put into production and not only used for operational purposes.

I do not believe the statement below is accurate.
 ranking=15.321872410401184 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0.31, smog=0.92, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.28, pop=2.95, numsent=4, flesch=1.29, ari=0.21, lix=0, time=0.5, numword=3, fuzzy=0.5, fog=0.47}
 orders: orig=4, rank=2, date=4

 ranking=2.091042453358316 from {pop=3.1, coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=2, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=1, rank=3, date=1

 ranking=1.3332133440562162 from {pop=2.84, coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=1.5, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=2, rank=4, date=2

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 12:34:01: I believe that what I reported could have been regarding some sort of domestic AI/ NLP rollout to “combat” misinformation. I have a strong feeling this pilot took place over the last two years and was backed by The United States Intelligence Community. Will continue to… Show more
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 9 of 6 (reached end) 150% 11% 11%
Anomalous elevated replies:
  • [original: #2, ranking: #8, date: #3] From @sparklingruby on 02/17/23 01:01:44
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
  • The mitary intelligence community, not the civilian IC community.
    [original: #9, ranking: #3, date: #1] From @stillwaterlife1 on 02/17/23 12:35:06
Other hidden replies:
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626688198968594446, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:01:03 (HIGH,1,7,1,368) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626688370133856257, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:01:44 (HIGH,,6,1,409) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626689160785367040, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:04:53 (HIGH,1,4,1,714) "It was a contractor."  "No that was a different contractor."  "And then there was a separate pilot."  "....That didn't feed into the predictive modeling."]
[tweet: 1626689540638363665, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:06:23 (HIGH,1,8,,559) .@AGJeffLandry Please get in touch with me. I have strong reason to believe this pilot was put into production and not only used for operational purposes.  I do not believe the statement below is accurate.]
[tweet: 1626698634749267987, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 01:42:31 (HIGH,0,,,212) To be clear- I am stating this as an opinion. Not a fact.]
[tweet: 1626699042154749952, from: @futurenews2020 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:44:08 (HIGH,0,,,16) If misinformation originates from the WH/DHS  its not a feeling its a fact]
[tweet: 1626695175824367616, from: @futurenews2020 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:28:47 (HIGH,0,,,41) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626697709343379456, from: @futurenews2020 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:38:51 (HIGH,0,,,16) The state disinform&suppress  comes down to coverup of its role in already conducted population genome. alteration]
[tweet: 1626681669611835393, from: @stillwaterlife1 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:35:06 (LOW,0,,,42) The mitary intelligence community, not the civilian IC community.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
.@AGJeffLandry Please get in touch with me. I have strong reason to believe this pilot was put into production and not only used for operational purposes.

I do not believe the statement below is accurate.
 ranking=17.217311526089613 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0.78, smog=0.92, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.28, pop=2.95, numsent=4, flesch=1.29, ari=0.21, lix=0, time=1.12, numword=3, fuzzy=1.3, fog=0.47}
 orders: orig=4, rank=1, date=5
"It was a contractor."

"No that was a different contractor."

"And then there was a separate pilot."

"....That didn't feed into the predictive modeling."
 ranking=16.227955137951803 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0.26, smog=0.9, kincaid=0.24, pop=2.78, numsent=5, flesch=1.31, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=1.34, numword=2, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.62}
 orders: orig=3, rank=2, date=4
The mitary intelligence community, not the civilian IC community.
 ranking=11.765789919100856 from {coleman=1.01, numsent=1, flesch=1.81, cos=0.85, smog=1.4, ari=0.6, lix=0.1, time=2, numword=0, kincaid=0.65, fuzzy=1.3, fog=1.07}
 orders: orig=9, rank=3, date=1
The state disinform&suppress  comes down to coverup of its role in already conducted population genome. alteration
 ranking=10.893391193441705 from {coleman=0.88, cos=0, smog=1.4, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.67, numsent=1, flesch=1.7, ari=0.69, lix=0.99, time=0.67, numword=1, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.82}
 orders: orig=8, rank=4, date=7
If misinformation originates from the WH/DHS  its not a feeling its a fact
 ranking=8.024298144263637 from {coleman=0.56, numsent=1, flesch=1.54, cos=0.72, smog=1.08, ari=0.31, lix=0.05, time=0.23, numword=1, kincaid=0.49, fuzzy=0.5, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=6, rank=5, date=9
To be clear- I am stating this as an opinion. Not a fact.
 ranking=6.141133163680571 from {coleman=0.17, numsent=2, flesch=1.04, cos=0, smog=0.69, ari=-0.14, lix=0, time=0.45, numword=1, kincaid=0.08, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=5, rank=6, date=8

 ranking=1.8688202311360937 from {pop=3.1, coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=1.78, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=1, rank=7, date=2

 ranking=1.3887688996117717 from {pop=2.84, coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=1.56, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=2, rank=8, date=3

 ranking=-2.111111111111111 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=0.89, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=7, rank=9, date=6

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 12:16:41: AIDA: "Finding conflicting accounts of an event" “Is that a fish tank? Is it a military tank? What kind of tank is it?” #AI #ML #NLP
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 2 of 2 (reached end) 100% 0% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626678146207473667, from: @mrdirt45 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:21:06 (HIGH,0,,,12) Battle plan scenarios?]
[tweet: 1626679551194718209, from: @beekneecards (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:26:41 (HIGH,0,,,10) That hypothesis layer is a convenient place upon which to deploy an ethics module. Anywhere lower, and it would complicate vector computations. Depending on the interface, a stack overflow can occur and produce responses that are otherwise undesirable or incorrect.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
That hypothesis layer is a convenient place upon which to deploy an ethics module. Anywhere lower, and it would complicate vector computations. Depending on the interface, a stack overflow can occur and produce responses that are otherwise undesirable or incorrect.
 ranking=14.701267198343666 from {coleman=0.84, cos=0, smog=1.4, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.58, numsent=3, flesch=1.64, ari=0.57, lix=0.08, time=1, numword=4, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.87}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=2
Battle plan scenarios?
 ranking=2.8289392241718323 from {coleman=1.08, numsent=1, flesch=1.38, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, ari=0.5, lix=0.05, time=2, numword=0, kincaid=0.27, fog=0.73}
 orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=1

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 12:09:31: “If you can train/ teach your image processing engine not only to recognize faces, but to recognize overlays and to read inside and say the statement about the truth of the internal content is false.. That's what we try to do now.” #NLP
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 4 of 8 (reached end) 50% 0% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626674721730224174, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:07:30 (HIGH,5,12,3,1001) “So the new domain we are now tackling is Covid. All of society and humanity needs to know what's the truth.” #NLP]
[tweet: 1626675229517832208, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:09:31 (HIGH,0,0,0,0) “If you can train/ teach your image processing engine not only to recognize faces, but to recognize overlays and to read inside and say the statement about the truth of the internal content is false.. That's what we try to do now.” #NLP]
[tweet: 1626679211262988309, from: @mrdirt45 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:25:20 (HIGH,0,,,2) When fact becomes fiction.]
[tweet: 1626688826214154240, from: @funva_oped (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:03:33 (HIGH,0,,,26) already been implemented for some years]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
“If you can train/ teach your image processing engine not only to recognize faces, but to recognize overlays and to read inside and say the statement about the truth of the internal content is false.. That's what we try to do now.” #NLP
 ranking=33.3689073835272 from {coleman=0.48, smog=1.08, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.34, jrw=0.5, numsent=3, flesch=1.29, ari=0.29, lix=0, time=1.5, numword=4, fuzzy=19.85, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=2
“So the new domain we are now tackling is Covid. All of society and humanity needs to know what's the truth.” #NLP
 ranking=15.653980037009026 from {coleman=0.36, cos=0.79, smog=0.62, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.12, pop=3.99, numsent=3, flesch=1.1, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=2, numword=2, fuzzy=1, fog=0.24}
 orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=1
already been implemented for some years
 ranking=6.336914224171833 from {coleman=0.88, numsent=1, flesch=1.27, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.42, lix=0.06, time=0.5, numword=0, kincaid=0.23, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.46}
 orders: orig=4, rank=3, date=4
When fact becomes fiction.
 ranking=1.4749350575051663 from {coleman=0.83, numsent=1, flesch=1.46, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, ari=0.33, lix=0.11, time=1, numword=0, kincaid=0.34, fog=0.59}
 orders: orig=3, rank=4, date=3

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 12:07:30: “So the new domain we are now tackling is Covid. All of society and humanity needs to know what's the truth.” #NLP
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Normal 5 of 8 (reached end) 62% 0% 20%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
  • Picture the conversations: P1: How many people are standing in our way? P2: A small number. P3: No. I don't believe it's a small number. It's a large number, more than half. P1: How can we find out? P3: By reading their social media posts (w/ NLP), looking for certain phrases.
    [original: #5, ranking: #4, date: #4] From @reardongalt on 02/17/23 12:23:22
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626674721730224174, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:07:30 (HIGH,0,0,0,0) “So the new domain we are now tackling is Covid. All of society and humanity needs to know what's the truth.” #NLP]
[tweet: 1626675229517832208, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:09:31 (HIGH,1,2,2,663) “If you can train/ teach your image processing engine not only to recognize faces, but to recognize overlays and to read inside and say the statement about the truth of the internal content is false.. That's what we try to do now.” #NLP]
[tweet: 1626677747882811407, from: @reardongalt (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:19:31 (HIGH,,,1,14) This is what I mean. One of the things he says is, "so we can see WHO is saying that."  I'm looking at all this stuff from a slightly different POV now. For a while, anyway.  I'm starting to think all of this NLP/ML is more about "who is saying" than the "what they're saying".]
[tweet: 1626678910833381385, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:24:09 (HIGH,,,1,10) This is what I have been trying to help people understand re entity mapping. It's not only what you say that matters- it is also who you are saying it to.   Twitter Spaces is as a powerful entity mapping data source for political affiliations.]
[tweet: 1626678713197776900, from: @reardongalt (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:23:22 (LOW,0,,,8) Picture the conversations:  P1: How many people are standing in our way? P2: A small number. P3: No. I don't believe it's a small number. It's a large number, more than half. P1: How can we find out? P3: By reading their social media posts (w/ NLP), looking for certain phrases.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
“So the new domain we are now tackling is Covid. All of society and humanity needs to know what's the truth.” #NLP
 ranking=20.390453956493026 from {coleman=0.36, smog=0.62, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.12, jrw=0.5, numsent=3, flesch=1.1, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=2, numword=2, fuzzy=9.95, fog=0.24}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
“If you can train/ teach your image processing engine not only to recognize faces, but to recognize overlays and to read inside and say the statement about the truth of the internal content is false.. That's what we try to do now.” #NLP
 ranking=17.676662761535137 from {coleman=0.48, cos=0.79, smog=1.08, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.34, pop=2.84, numsent=3, flesch=1.29, ari=0.29, lix=0, time=1.6, numword=4, fuzzy=1, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
This is what I mean. One of the things he says is, "so we can see WHO is saying that."

I'm looking at all this stuff from a slightly different POV now. For a while, anyway.

I'm starting to think all of this NLP/ML is more about "who is saying" than the "what they're saying".
 ranking=16.22120453601876 from {coleman=0.31, cos=0.26, smog=0.55, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.08, pop=1.61, numsent=5, flesch=0.99, ari=0.06, lix=0, time=1.2, numword=5, fuzzy=0.5, fog=0.25}
 orders: orig=3, rank=3, date=3
Picture the conversations:

P1: How many people are standing in our way?
P2: A small number.
P3: No. I don't believe it's a small number. It's a large number, more than half.
P1: How can we find out?
P3: By reading their social media posts (w/ NLP), looking for certain phrases.
 ranking=15.765892691604208 from {coleman=0.42, numsent=7, flesch=1.1, cos=0.2, smog=0.51, ari=0.07, lix=0, time=0.8, numword=5, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.12, fog=0.18}
 orders: orig=5, rank=4, date=4
This is what I have been trying to help people understand re entity mapping. It's not only what you say that matters- it is also who you are saying it to. 

Twitter Spaces is as a powerful entity mapping data source for political affiliations.
 ranking=13.364144219661574 from {coleman=0.52, cos=0, smog=0.94, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.33, pop=1.61, numsent=3, flesch=1.26, ari=0.33, lix=0, time=0.4, numword=4, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.48}
 orders: orig=4, rank=5, date=5

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 11:23:18: They are not suppressing speech. They are rewriting language. It’s hard to explain. It is much larger than suppression. They are modifying behavior with RFL. This will have a tremendous impact on the future of language/ speech.
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Worse 11 of 38 (reached end) 28% 0% 36%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
  • Yes it is. I just mean it is much deeper than that first layer. That is the part I don’t think people realize. They stop the convo at layer 1. The dangerous part is what happens after that.
    [original: #9, ranking: #3, date: #7] From @sparklingruby on 02/17/23 11:31:35
Other hidden replies:
  • Steering conversation towards preferred speech is still a suppression of original speech though, right?
    [original: #8, ranking: #4, date: #5] From @jared_t_martin on 02/17/23 11:28:26
  • Orwellian
    [original: #11, ranking: #10, date: #10] From @scott_soulia on 02/17/23 12:31:04
  • [original: #10, ranking: #11, date: #1] From @placeholder_handle on 12/31/69 04:00:00
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626662654465957888, from: @recmastermind (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:19:33 (HIGH,,1,1,215) Keep it going. Expose those that are suppressing free speech. No matter who it is.]
[tweet: 1626663600046632961, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 11:23:18 (HIGH,0,0,0,0) They are not suppressing speech. They are rewriting language. It’s hard to explain. It is much larger than suppression. They are modifying behavior with RFL. This will have a tremendous impact on the future of language/ speech.]
[tweet: 1626665044430753792, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 11:29:03 (HIGH,,4,,89) Injection of AI prompts to modify behavior. It goes beyond suppression. They are attempting to modify the behavior/ language w/ “prompts” of positive behavior as a form of RFL.]
[tweet: 1626664401376796682, from: @recmastermind (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:26:29 (HIGH,0,,,42) Wow... So twisting words to their advantage.. I think.]
[tweet: 1626694997692264450, from: @cpoppino (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:28:04 (HIGH,,1,,11) This makes me think of a YouTube series I recently watched by Cyprian. He was talking about how we (the people/consumer) have been training AI for years via social media and now AI is training us (language, speech, behavior, wants, likes, etc.)]
[tweet: 1626666440206999567, from: @elonsavedtwit (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:34:36 (HIGH,0,,,24) Microsoft started doing this in word years ago. Slightly nudging you away from words that are on the micro aggression list. Apple and all the search engines have done it with “ok”, they mark it as a spelling or grammar error because of a 4chan hoax.]
[tweet: 1626667382608388099, from: @scottkhealy (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:38:20 (HIGH,0,,,15) I guess, for those inextricably bound to software. I'm not in that boat and parents shouldn't allow their kids to be in that boat, either.]
[tweet: 1626664890181074945, from: @jared_t_martin (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:28:26 (LOW,,,1,22) Steering conversation towards preferred speech is still a suppression of original speech though, right?]
[tweet: 1626665682891857923, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 11:31:35 (LOW,,2,1,19) Yes it is. I just mean it is much deeper than that first layer. That is the part I don’t think people realize. They stop the convo at layer 1. The dangerous part is what happens after that.]
[tweet: 0, from: @placeholder_handle (UNKNOWN) on 12/31/69 04:00:00 (LOW,0,0,0,0) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626680653788991488, from: @scott_soulia (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:31:04 (ABUSIVE,0,,,8) Orwellian]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
They are not suppressing speech. They are rewriting language. It’s hard to explain. It is much larger than suppression. They are modifying behavior with RFL. This will have a tremendous impact on the future of language/ speech.
 ranking=35.95994452720213 from {coleman=0.69, smog=0.85, jac=0.5, kincaid=0.23, jrw=0.5, numsent=6, flesch=1.27, ari=0.26, lix=0, time=1.64, numword=3, fuzzy=20.6, fog=0.46}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=3
Injection of AI prompts to modify behavior. It goes beyond suppression. They are attempting to modify the behavior/ language w/ “prompts” of positive behavior as a form of RFL.
 ranking=15.352599555994622 from {coleman=0.65, cos=1.18, smog=1.14, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.35, pop=2.08, numsent=3, flesch=1.38, ari=0.32, lix=0.08, time=1.1, numword=2, fuzzy=1, fog=0.68}
 orders: orig=3, rank=2, date=6
Yes it is. I just mean it is much deeper than that first layer. That is the part I don’t think people realize. They stop the convo at layer 1. The dangerous part is what happens after that.
 ranking=14.12675335388434 from {coleman=0.35, cos=0.2, smog=0.55, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.06, pop=2.2, numsent=5, flesch=0.99, ari=0.02, lix=0, time=0.91, numword=3, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.21}
 orders: orig=9, rank=3, date=7
Steering conversation towards preferred speech is still a suppression of original speech though, right?
 ranking=12.826328548549492 from {coleman=1.07, cos=1.22, smog=1.25, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.55, pop=1.61, numsent=1, flesch=1.59, ari=0.76, lix=0.11, time=1.28, numword=1, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.71}
 orders: orig=8, rank=4, date=5
This makes me think of a YouTube series I recently watched by Cyprian. He was talking about how we (the people/consumer) have been training AI for years via social media and now AI is training us (language, speech, behavior, wants, likes, etc.)
 ranking=12.781188210475339 from {coleman=0.49, cos=0.83, smog=0.69, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.42, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=1.28, ari=0.46, lix=0.07, time=0.19, numword=4, fuzzy=0.8, fog=0.46}
 orders: orig=5, rank=5, date=11
Keep it going.
Expose those that are suppressing free speech.
No matter who it is.
 ranking=12.18286638519809 from {coleman=0.49, cos=0.99, smog=0.62, kincaid=0.07, pop=1.95, numsent=3, flesch=1.06, ari=0.08, lix=0, time=1.82, numword=1, fuzzy=0.9, fog=0.24}
 orders: orig=1, rank=6, date=2
Microsoft started doing this in word years ago. Slightly nudging you away from words that are on the micro aggression list. Apple and all the search engines have done it with “ok”, they mark it as a spelling or grammar error because of a 4chan hoax.
 ranking=11.67139927028514 from {coleman=0.48, numsent=3, flesch=1.14, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.33, lix=0.05, time=0.73, numword=4, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.26, fog=0.44}
 orders: orig=6, rank=7, date=8
I guess, for those inextricably bound to software. I'm not in that boat and parents shouldn't allow their kids to be in that boat, either.
 ranking=8.640125706162243 from {coleman=0.47, cos=0, smog=0.69, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.22, numsent=2, flesch=1.16, ari=0.22, lix=0, time=0.55, numword=2, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.32}
 orders: orig=7, rank=8, date=9
Wow...
So twisting words to their advantage..
I think.
 ranking=7.277767665006737 from {coleman=0.52, numsent=3, flesch=1.1, cos=0, smog=0.62, ari=0.06, lix=0, time=1.46, numword=0, kincaid=0.07, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=4, rank=9, date=4
Orwellian
 ranking=7.24450892114153 from {coleman=1.87, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=1.02, numsent=1, flesch=2.48, ari=1.08, lix=0.99, time=0.37, numword=0, fuzzy=0.6, fog=2.03}
 orders: orig=11, rank=10, date=10

 ranking=-1.0 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=2, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=10, rank=11, date=1

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 11:17:18: I have a strong feeling that military grade NLP was deployed to censor the discussion of vaccine safety / masks / Covid over the past two years. Will further research this.
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Worse 11 of 8 (reached end) 137% 36% 0%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
Other hidden replies:
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626674721730224174, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:07:30 (HIGH,5,12,3,993) “So the new domain we are now tackling is Covid. All of society and humanity needs to know what's the truth.” #NLP]
[tweet: 1626675229517832208, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:09:31 (HIGH,1,2,2,658) “If you can train/ teach your image processing engine not only to recognize faces, but to recognize overlays and to read inside and say the statement about the truth of the internal content is false.. That's what we try to do now.” #NLP]
[tweet: 1626664960951476224, from: @mrdirt45 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:28:43 (HIGH,,1,,38) I keep wondering about the Twitter back channels and the thousands fired and if there was a vetting process. The sheer numbers and possibility of infiltration was enormous.]
[tweet: 1626663294772854784, from: @1averagejeff (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:22:06 (HIGH,,2,,57) Genuine question:  What would be different with ‘military grade’ NLP?  I’m a software developer and curious about best practices.]
[tweet: 1626666189966434312, from: @ben_hoodwinked (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:33:36 (HIGH,0,,,45) I love this thread you’re pulling!  Fair warning:  This is somewhat dangerous territory considering how it echoes some theories espoused by Q-followers, et al.    Critics will accuse you of that alignment if they can.]
[tweet: 1626676136284499968, from: @tinfoolingarou1 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:13:07 (HIGH,,,1,9) Whats wrong with being right about a theory?]
[tweet: 1626693606479396864, from: @futurenews2020 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:22:32 (HIGH,0,,,26) Correct… its up to very few who understand it to keep exposing it]
[tweet: 1626667257681043477, from: @funva_oped (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:37:50 (HIGH,,2,,27) Military grade AI?]
[tweet: 1626670916267823105, from: @elnelberto (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:52:23 (HIGH,,1,,24) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626663842238369793, from: @aggiejoe10 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:24:16 (HIGH,,3,,38) Oh shit... I just looked up what an NLP is. targeting our own.]
[tweet: 1626678516354895876, from: @nick220848911 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:22:35 (HIGH,,,1,10) Neuro linguistic programming which only means that 1975 was a way better time to live]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
“If you can train/ teach your image processing engine not only to recognize faces, but to recognize overlays and to read inside and say the statement about the truth of the internal content is false.. That's what we try to do now.” #NLP
 ranking=16.152611345092133 from {coleman=0.48, cos=0.22, smog=1.08, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.34, pop=2.84, numsent=3, flesch=1.29, ari=0.29, lix=0, time=0.73, numword=4, fuzzy=0.9, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=8
“So the new domain we are now tackling is Covid. All of society and humanity needs to know what's the truth.” #NLP
 ranking=15.816551601303738 from {coleman=0.36, cos=0.61, smog=0.62, jac=0.48, kincaid=0.12, pop=3.99, numsent=3, flesch=1.1, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=0.91, numword=2, fuzzy=2.4, fog=0.24}
 orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=7
Genuine question:

What would be different with
‘military grade’ NLP?

I’m a software developer and curious about best practices.
 ranking=12.81413061965022 from {coleman=0.87, cos=0.91, smog=1.08, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.45, pop=1.39, numsent=2, flesch=1.53, ari=0.48, lix=0.1, time=2, numword=1, fog=0.63}
 orders: orig=4, rank=3, date=1
I love this thread you’re pulling!

Fair warning:  This is somewhat dangerous territory considering how it echoes some theories espoused by Q-followers, et al.  

Critics will accuse you of that alignment if they can.
 ranking=12.530117339898668 from {coleman=0.66, cos=0, smog=1.01, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.36, numsent=3, flesch=1.37, ari=0.36, lix=0.07, time=1.46, numword=3, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.53}
 orders: orig=5, rank=4, date=4
I keep wondering about the Twitter back channels and the thousands fired and if there was a vetting process. The sheer numbers and possibility of infiltration was enormous.
 ranking=11.610203914736493 from {coleman=0.72, cos=0, smog=1.08, jac=0.48, kincaid=0.45, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=1.44, ari=0.49, lix=0.09, time=1.64, numword=2, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=3, rank=5, date=3
Oh shit... I just looked up what an NLP is. targeting our own.
 ranking=9.126724450956017 from {pop=1.8, coleman=0.23, numsent=2, flesch=0.98, cos=0.41, smog=0.69, ari=-0.09, lix=0, time=1.82, numword=1, kincaid=0.03, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=10, rank=6, date=2
Neuro linguistic programming which only means that 1975 was a way better time to live
 ranking=8.148060945311947 from {pop=1.61, coleman=0.61, numsent=1, flesch=1.22, cos=0, smog=1.08, ari=0.42, lix=0, time=0.37, numword=1, kincaid=0.3, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=11, rank=7, date=10
Correct… its up to very few who understand it to keep exposing it
 ranking=7.083503312598126 from {coleman=0.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.24, cos=0, smog=1.08, ari=0.2, lix=0.05, time=0.19, numword=1, kincaid=0.3, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=7, rank=8, date=11
Whats wrong with being right about a theory?
 ranking=6.043223707888645 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.05, pop=1.61, numsent=1, flesch=0.97, ari=0.19, lix=0, time=0.55, numword=0, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.16}
 orders: orig=6, rank=9, date=9
Military grade AI?
 ranking=4.43599472973158 from {coleman=0.69, cos=1.16, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.27, pop=1.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.38, ari=0.19, lix=0.05, time=1.28, numword=0, fuzzy=0.5, fog=0.73}
 orders: orig=8, rank=10, date=5

 ranking=-1.2159437285309638 from {pop=0.7, coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=1.1, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=9, rank=11, date=6

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 09:48:54: The more I discover, the more I begin to think I have uncovered something that I am really not supposed to be talking about.
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Bad 45 of 38 (reached end) 118% 26% 13%
Anomalous elevated replies:
  • Post it.
    [original: #15, ranking: #44, date: #45] From @jmstradescrypto on 02/17/23 01:37:29
  • Why?
    [original: #8, ranking: #42, date: #30] From @sparklingruby on 02/17/23 11:11:51
  • We all have.. be careful.
    [original: #10, ranking: #41, date: #26] From @corbycar on 02/17/23 10:52:56
  • No idea what that means
    [original: #6, ranking: #36, date: #24] From @sparklingruby on 02/17/23 10:29:08
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
  • I learned what they can do with the nano aerosols out of airplanes. Basically they can spy on anyone without anyone ever knowing. I pulled 8 of these out of the wall. We were building an app to not collect data. This nano tech is on notebook paper. Been Havana'd 5 or 6 times now
    [original: #37, ranking: #3, date: #28] From @chadwagainstwef on 02/17/23 11:04:16
  • Been following you for a while and my brain just can’t help but get this sense about your tweets: Valuing profound ideas over simpler ones can provide insight, but can also lead to overcomplication and neglect of practical concerns.
    [original: #33, ranking: #4, date: #12] From @ftxclone on 02/17/23 10:06:35
  • The scale of which information operations are being implemented and conducted in the U.S....targeting American citizens..is unprecedented. The tip of the iceberg. No one has our back.
    [original: #43, ranking: #8, date: #16] From @jhouse678 on 02/17/23 10:17:33
  • No, you've discovered something that directly needs not only talked about, but thoroughly investigated at the highest levels!! You go girl!!!
    [original: #35, ranking: #9, date: #25] From @michael92333436 on 02/17/23 10:50:38
  • nah I think ur just clickbait and the 'deeper' you go (drinking your own koolaid) the more absolutely unhinged you sound. confirmation bias. look it up kid.
    [original: #44, ranking: #14, date: #2] From @aproposapropos on 02/17/23 09:51:31
  • Don’t mysteriously fall from a window, freak car accident or an Epstein yourself.
    [original: #39, ranking: #15, date: #9] From @tedj0615 on 02/17/23 09:55:09
Other hidden replies:
  • Do the exact opposite of how you feel. Ironically usually the right move.
    [original: #41, ranking: #27, date: #40] From @jacquie04063120 on 02/17/23 12:02:12
  • The more you have to talk about it!!! Keep going!
    [original: #40, ranking: #30, date: #37] From @yossishow on 02/17/23 11:31:26
  • If it's not getting clicks its not click bait.
    [original: #45, ranking: #34, date: #18] From @trippyrox on 02/17/23 10:23:46
  • Are there words that get promoted?
    [original: #42, ranking: #35, date: #42] From @larrydarp on 02/17/23 12:22:16
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626662654465957888, from: @recmastermind (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:19:33 (HIGH,,1,1,215) Keep it going. Expose those that are suppressing free speech. No matter who it is.]
[tweet: 1626663600046632961, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 11:23:18 (HIGH,9,29,7,979) They are not suppressing speech. They are rewriting language. It’s hard to explain. It is much larger than suppression. They are modifying behavior with RFL. This will have a tremendous impact on the future of language/ speech.]
[tweet: 1626661078749925377, from: @pklibertarian (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:13:17 (HIGH,,,1,168) Can you be more specific about the topic? My experience with digging into the JFK assassination case is about the same, but yours may differ.]
[tweet: 1626662873794502663, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 11:20:25 (HIGH,,1,,146) Twitter political misinfo detection:]
[tweet: 1626649783833174016, from: @howard_wemple (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:28:24 (HIGH,,5,1,250) Welcome to the club!  We're called Anons.]
[tweet: 1626649966197280804, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 10:29:08 (HIGH,,,1,246) No idea what that means]
[tweet: 1626660370268971025, from: @elonsavedtwit (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:10:28 (HIGH,,1,1,149) You have but someone has to do it. Truth is you probably should have used a false identity for all this reporting.]
[tweet: 1626660717704237056, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 11:11:51 (HIGH,,,1,151) Why?]
[tweet: 1626641209237307392, from: @sillysaltyafvet (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:54:20 (HIGH,,3,,203) I think we all feel this way.  I am eternally grateful to @elonmusk for allowing us a platform to talk about all of it,  without censorship.]
[tweet: 1626655956426969089, from: @corbycar (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:52:56 (HIGH,0,,,36) We all have.. be careful.]
[tweet: 1626641080559992832, from: @0sweetsolace0 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:53:49 (HIGH,,2,,178) keep it up,I suspect your uncovered the sinister uses of AI. When I first read up AI  I learn the basics but my little sister  any computer has to be programmed. My sister told me back in the 90s. Never forgot it. Plus I learned alot of IT when I was employed]
[tweet: 1626640747049934848, from: @trbwlkrmusic (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:52:30 (HIGH,,4,,302) I have thought several times now “you probably shouldn’t have posted that on her tweet, stay under the radar”  Too late now Kristen! Lol]
[tweet: 1626640441167994880, from: @nearme_networks (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:51:17 (HIGH,,4,,235) That stuff gets deep, stay sharp.]
[tweet: 1626643294410141701, from: @nottabott1 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:02:37 (HIGH,0,,,108) My circumstances may be completely different, but, that would be reason enough for me to absolutely say it.]
[tweet: 1626697365271859221, from: @jmstradescrypto (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:37:29 (HIGH,0,,,6) Post it.]
[tweet: 1626668299458121728, from: @mrdirt45 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:41:59 (HIGH,0,,,27) Who has something to gain from you releasing this information? Someone has the possibility of substantial gain or substantial reason.]
[tweet: 1626649398993162268, from: @julieroo17 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:26:53 (HIGH,0,,,77) Well yes,the truth gets no traction and Twitter won’t acknowledge they still have many bugs.(AI and gov) Don’t get discouraged, just get louder. What your doing is appreciated.]
[tweet: 1626641390116691968, from: @ilovespaceforce (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:55:03 (HIGH,,3,,193) I'm inclined to agree with you.]
[tweet: 1626644935997853698, from: @babyblu41005738 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:09:09 (HIGH,0,,,78) Right, the more u research the worse it gets hu lol]
[tweet: 1626648732732366848, from: @missv15 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:24:14 (HIGH,,1,,118) Never stop.]
[tweet: 1626641348039217154, from: @ds_ferrin (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:54:53 (HIGH,,2,,128) That makes no sense.  If it's hurting the country it needs to be exposed.]
[tweet: 1626648788403163149, from: @georgel73128612 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:24:27 (HIGH,,2,1,88) That might be an understatement of http://magnitude.You are just scratching the surface at this point. There are deep deep pockets behind this and we are just privy to a few of the hired hands.]
[tweet: 1626649388754804736, from: @georgel73128612 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:26:50 (HIGH,,2,1,30) They never saw Elon coming into the picture.And never saw the hand off of documents to you.I just wonder how you were chosen for such a monumental undertaking.]
[tweet: 1626640749659041792, from: @dickmasterson (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:52:30 (HIGH,,4,,299) You’re 100% not.]
[tweet: 1626662939661856770, from: @run21farm (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:20:41 (HIGH,0,,,26) Absolutely]
[tweet: 1626646802182115337, from: @superdeepdown (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:16:33 (HIGH,,2,1,88) Talk to the ppl @TheRedactedInc very solid group of individuals]
[tweet: 1626646849284177920, from: @superdeepdown (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:16:45 (HIGH,,1,1,30) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626657859118194688, from: @tracy369smart (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:00:30 (HIGH,0,,,22) Fear Not]
[tweet: 1626667574997172224, from: @donwiozy2 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:39:06 (HIGH,0,,,18) Such as?]
[tweet: 1626681531514118144, from: @mrdirt45 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:34:34 (HIGH,0,,,10) Sooner or later the TRUTH will be revealed and I hope you are rewarded beyond your wildest immagination.]
[tweet: 1626641641330167808, from: @saklas7 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:56:03 (HIGH,,2,,81) Do it anyway.]
[tweet: 1626663794091991040, from: @waldotj (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:24:05 (HIGH,0,,,23) just be sure to regularly post how happy and NON-suicidial you are.]
[tweet: 1626644292122083329, from: @ftxclone (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:06:35 (HIGH,0,,,82) Been following you for a while and my brain just can’t help but get this sense about your tweets: Valuing profound ideas over simpler ones can provide insight, but can also lead to overcomplication and neglect of practical concerns.]
[tweet: 1626696997934891008, from: @futurenews2020 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:36:01 (HIGH,0,,,17) the government/state intent behind suppression actually is the ONLY thing that is worth discussing now]
[tweet: 1626655379307528193, from: @michael92333436 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:50:38 (HIGH,,1,,34) No, you've discovered something that directly needs not only talked about, but thoroughly investigated at the highest levels!! You go girl!!!]
[tweet: 1626675032347795464, from: @richellefritz (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:08:44 (HIGH,0,,,19) It do be like that. Keep digging and youll look up one day to see an inverted world full of people speaking backwards.]
[tweet: 1626658807899103233, from: @chadwagainstwef (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:04:16 (HIGH,0,,,23) I learned what they can do with the nano aerosols out of airplanes.  Basically they can spy on anyone without anyone ever knowing. I pulled 8 of these out of the wall. We were building an app to not collect data. This nano tech is on notebook paper. Been Havana'd 5 or 6 times now]
[tweet: 1626647794957094915, from: @trippyrox (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:20:30 (HIGH,,1,,56) You are exposing exactly how the world is being controlled and manipulated.]
[tweet: 1626641415739674624, from: @tedj0615 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:55:09 (HIGH,,3,,112) Don’t mysteriously fall from a window, freak car accident or an Epstein yourself.]
[tweet: 1626665646434967555, from: @yossishow (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:31:26 (LOW,,1,,16) The more you have to talk about it!!! Keep going!]
[tweet: 1626673386276413446, from: @jacquie04063120 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:02:12 (LOW,0,,,2) Do the exact opposite of how you feel. Ironically usually the right move.]
[tweet: 1626678439859351552, from: @larrydarp (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:22:16 (LOW,0,,,5) Are there words that get promoted?]
[tweet: 1626647051638345736, from: @jhouse678 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:17:33 (LOW,0,,,21) The scale of which information operations are being implemented and conducted in the U.S....targeting American citizens..is unprecedented. The tip of the iceberg. No one has our back.]
[tweet: 1626640499279859716, from: @aproposapropos (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:51:31 (LOW,0,,,60) nah I think ur just clickbait and the 'deeper' you go (drinking your own koolaid) the more absolutely unhinged you sound.  confirmation bias. look it up kid.]
[tweet: 1626648614582816780, from: @trippyrox (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:23:46 (LOW,,1,,9) If it's not getting clicks its not click bait.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
They are not suppressing speech. They are rewriting language. It’s hard to explain. It is much larger than suppression. They are modifying behavior with RFL. This will have a tremendous impact on the future of language/ speech.
 ranking=19.114961522509432 from {coleman=0.69, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.23, pop=4.79, numsent=6, flesch=1.27, ari=0.26, lix=0, time=0.49, numword=3, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.46}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=35
keep it up,I suspect your uncovered the sinister uses of AI. When I first read up AI  I learn the basics but my little sister  any computer has to be programmed. My sister told me back in the 90s. Never forgot it. Plus I learned alot of IT when I was employed
 ranking=16.657942008339525 from {coleman=0.33, cos=0.27, smog=0.73, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.19, pop=1.39, numsent=5, flesch=1.13, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=1.83, numword=5, fog=0.33}
 orders: orig=11, rank=2, date=5
I learned what they can do with the nano aerosols out of airplanes.  Basically they can spy on anyone without anyone ever knowing. I pulled 8 of these out of the wall. We were building an app to not collect data. This nano tech is on notebook paper. Been Havana'd 5 or 6 times now
 ranking=15.401659891796255 from {coleman=0.37, cos=0, smog=0.75, jac=0.48, kincaid=0.18, numsent=6, flesch=1.14, ari=0.08, lix=0, time=0.8, numword=5, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.33}
 orders: orig=37, rank=3, date=28
Been following you for a while and my brain just can’t help but get this sense about your tweets: Valuing profound ideas over simpler ones can provide insight, but can also lead to overcomplication and neglect of practical concerns.
 ranking=14.11603519863531 from {coleman=0.66, cos=0, smog=1.25, jac=0.4, kincaid=0.87, numsent=1, flesch=1.61, ari=1.04, lix=0.99, time=1.52, numword=3, fuzzy=0.9, fog=0.92}
 orders: orig=33, rank=4, date=12
That might be an understatement of http://magnitude.You are just scratching the surface at this point. There are deep deep pockets behind this and we are just privy to a few of the hired hands.
 ranking=13.658535285694335 from {coleman=0.45, cos=0, smog=0.69, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.28, pop=2.2, numsent=2, flesch=1.16, ari=0.33, lix=0, time=1.16, numword=3, fuzzy=1.6, fog=0.4}
 orders: orig=22, rank=5, date=20
They never saw Elon coming into the picture.And never saw the hand off of documents to you.I just wonder how you were chosen for such a monumental undertaking.
 ranking=13.557793986497844 from {coleman=0.52, cos=0, smog=1.25, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.64, pop=2.2, numsent=1, flesch=1.5, ari=0.63, lix=0.05, time=1.12, numword=2, fuzzy=1.5, fog=0.76}
 orders: orig=23, rank=6, date=21
I think we all feel this way.  I am eternally grateful to @elonmusk for allowing us a platform to talk about all of it,  without censorship.
 ranking=13.084150511747275 from {coleman=0.4, cos=0.45, smog=1.08, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.32, pop=1.8, numsent=2, flesch=1.28, ari=0.2, lix=0.05, time=1.78, numword=2, fuzzy=0.8, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=9, rank=7, date=6
The scale of which information operations are being implemented and conducted in the U.S....targeting American citizens..is unprecedented.
The tip of the iceberg.
No one has our back.
 ranking=11.924325335908149 from {coleman=0.7, cos=0, smog=1.08, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.38, numsent=3, flesch=1.44, ari=0.33, lix=0.05, time=1.34, numword=2, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.65}
 orders: orig=43, rank=8, date=16
No, you've discovered something that directly needs not only talked about, but thoroughly investigated at the highest levels!!
You go girl!!!
 ranking=11.730437339854438 from {coleman=0.81, cos=0.43, smog=0.98, jac=0.45, kincaid=0.36, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=1.39, ari=0.46, lix=0.06, time=0.94, numword=2, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.5}
 orders: orig=35, rank=9, date=25
I have thought several times now “you probably shouldn’t have posted that on her tweet, stay under the radar”  Too late now Kristen! Lol
 ranking=11.723267291759514 from {coleman=0.48, cos=0, smog=0.69, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.22, pop=2.08, numsent=2, flesch=1.16, ari=0.23, lix=0, time=1.92, numword=2, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.32}
 orders: orig=12, rank=10, date=3
Who has something to gain from you releasing this information? Someone has the possibility of substantial gain or substantial reason.
 ranking=11.392693882170851 from {coleman=0.86, cos=0.38, smog=1.25, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.48, numsent=2, flesch=1.56, ari=0.5, lix=0.08, time=0.32, numword=2, fuzzy=0.8, fog=0.8}
 orders: orig=16, rank=11, date=39
Well yes,the truth gets no traction and Twitter won’t acknowledge they still have many bugs.(AI and gov)
Don’t get discouraged, just get louder. What your doing is appreciated.
 ranking=11.167185057505165 from {coleman=0.6, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.19, numsent=3, flesch=1.15, ari=0.28, lix=0, time=1.07, numword=3, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=17, rank=12, date=22
Can you be more specific about the topic? My experience with digging into the JFK assassination case is about the same, but yours may differ.
 ranking=10.710207972350704 from {coleman=0.56, cos=0, smog=0.98, kincaid=0.37, pop=1.61, numsent=2, flesch=1.35, ari=0.32, lix=0, time=0.67, numword=2, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.5}
 orders: orig=3, rank=13, date=31
nah I think ur just clickbait and the 'deeper' you go (drinking your own koolaid) the more absolutely unhinged you sound.

confirmation bias. look it up kid.
 ranking=10.623875022172513 from {coleman=0.56, cos=0.36, smog=0.85, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.32, numsent=2, flesch=1.26, ari=0.34, lix=0.05, time=1.96, numword=2, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.42}
 orders: orig=44, rank=14, date=2
Don’t mysteriously fall from a window, freak car accident or an Epstein yourself.
 ranking=10.322571416247316 from {coleman=0.74, cos=0, smog=1.08, kincaid=0.39, pop=1.8, numsent=1, flesch=1.4, ari=0.45, lix=0.08, time=1.65, numword=1, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=39, rank=15, date=9
You have but someone has to do it. Truth is you probably should have used a false identity for all this reporting.
 ranking=10.27270189847967 from {coleman=0.43, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.19, pop=1.95, numsent=2, flesch=1.13, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=0.76, numword=2, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=7, rank=16, date=29
My circumstances may be completely different, but, that would be reason enough for me to absolutely say it.
 ranking=9.574786781676998 from {coleman=0.64, cos=0, smog=1.4, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.56, numsent=1, flesch=1.53, ari=0.52, lix=0.06, time=1.56, numword=1, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.81}
 orders: orig=14, rank=17, date=11
You are exposing exactly how the world is being controlled and manipulated.
 ranking=9.412570238690318 from {coleman=0.76, cos=0, smog=1.08, kincaid=0.39, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.4, ari=0.47, lix=0.08, time=1.29, numword=1, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=38, rank=18, date=17
That makes no sense.  If it's hurting the country it needs to be exposed.
 ranking=9.333633463683995 from {coleman=0.42, cos=0, smog=0.3, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.08, pop=1.39, numsent=2, flesch=1.04, ari=0.06, lix=0, time=1.74, numword=1, fuzzy=0.8, fog=0.13}
 orders: orig=21, rank=19, date=7
Talk to the ppl @TheRedactedInc very solid group of individuals
 ranking=9.322763801508053 from {coleman=0.49, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.25, pop=2.2, numsent=1, flesch=1.25, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.43, numword=0, fuzzy=1.3, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=26, rank=20, date=14
Keep it going.
Expose those that are suppressing free speech.
No matter who it is.
 ranking=9.197163470627705 from {coleman=0.49, cos=0, smog=0.62, kincaid=0.07, pop=1.95, numsent=3, flesch=1.06, ari=0.08, lix=0, time=0.63, numword=1, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.24}
 orders: orig=1, rank=21, date=32
Absolutely
 ranking=8.880205890838498 from {coleman=2.16, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=1.6, numsent=1, flesch=3.33, ari=1.31, lix=0.99, time=0.54, numword=0, fuzzy=0.1, fog=2.03}
 orders: orig=25, rank=22, date=34
Welcome to the club!  We're called Anons.
 ranking=8.244489089991099 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.07, pop=2.71, numsent=2, flesch=1.1, ari=0.07, lix=0, time=1.03, numword=0, fuzzy=0.4, fog=0.07}
 orders: orig=5, rank=23, date=23
Sooner or later the TRUTH will be revealed and I hope you are rewarded beyond your wildest immagination.
 ranking=8.202730890838499 from {coleman=0.62, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.46, numsent=1, flesch=1.39, ari=0.51, lix=0.06, time=0.14, numword=1, fuzzy=1.3, fog=0.48}
 orders: orig=30, rank=24, date=43
That stuff gets deep, stay sharp.
 ranking=7.550633208346502 from {coleman=0.49, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=-0.07, pop=2.08, numsent=1, flesch=0.84, ari=0.1, lix=0, time=2, numword=0, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.13}
 orders: orig=13, rank=25, date=1
the government/state intent behind suppression actually is the ONLY thing that is worth discussing now
 ranking=7.369653415273229 from {coleman=0.73, cos=0, smog=1.08, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.38, numsent=1, flesch=1.35, ari=0.49, lix=0.05, time=0.09, numword=1, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=34, rank=26, date=44
Do the exact opposite of how you feel. Ironically usually the right move.
 ranking=7.302548839556448 from {coleman=0.55, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.26, numsent=2, flesch=1.3, ari=0.16, lix=0, time=0.27, numword=1, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.44}
 orders: orig=41, rank=27, date=40
It do be like that. Keep digging and youll look up one day to see an inverted world full of people speaking backwards.
 ranking=7.2381602657004835 from {coleman=0.42, cos=0, smog=0.3, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.14, numsent=2, flesch=1.05, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=0.23, numword=2, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.24}
 orders: orig=36, rank=28, date=41
I'm inclined to agree with you.
 ranking=7.099718358116944 from {coleman=0.51, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.03, pop=1.8, numsent=1, flesch=1, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=1.69, numword=0, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.1}
 orders: orig=18, rank=29, date=8
The more you have to talk about it!!! Keep going!
 ranking=7.044617180559946 from {coleman=0.28, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=-0.03, pop=0.7, numsent=2, flesch=0.92, ari=-0.09, lix=0, time=0.4, numword=1, fuzzy=1.5, fog=0.1}
 orders: orig=40, rank=30, date=37
Twitter political misinfo detection:
 ranking=6.613734127579206 from {coleman=1.57, cos=0, smog=1.08, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.93, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=2.3, ari=0.92, lix=0.99, time=0.58, numword=0, fuzzy=0.5, fog=1.08}
 orders: orig=4, rank=31, date=33
Right, the more u research the worse it gets hu lol
 ranking=6.072271212121212 from {coleman=0.29, numsent=1, flesch=0.97, cos=0, smog=0.3, ari=0.06, lix=0, time=1.47, numword=1, kincaid=0.08, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.23}
 orders: orig=19, rank=32, date=13
just be sure to regularly post how happy and NON-suicidial you are.
 ranking=5.891498820131429 from {coleman=0.34, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.14, numsent=1, flesch=1.05, ari=0.11, lix=0, time=0.45, numword=1, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=32, rank=33, date=36
If it's not getting clicks its not click bait.
 ranking=5.527172875004389 from {coleman=0.43, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.05, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=0.97, ari=0.1, lix=0, time=1.25, numword=0, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.16}
 orders: orig=45, rank=34, date=18
Are there words that get promoted?
 ranking=3.9649694444444443 from {coleman=0.59, numsent=1, flesch=0.98, cos=0, smog=0.3, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=0.18, numword=0, kincaid=0.03, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.13}
 orders: orig=42, rank=35, date=42
No idea what that means
 ranking=1.1010856902118773 from {coleman=0.33, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.09, pop=1.61, numsent=1, flesch=0.83, ari=-0.05, lix=0, time=0.98, numword=0, fuzzy=1.1, fog=0.1}
 orders: orig=6, rank=36, date=24
Never stop.
 ranking=1.0720221805599461 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.15, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=1.23, ari=0.04, lix=0, time=1.2, numword=0, fuzzy=0.9, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=20, rank=37, date=19
You’re 100% not.
 ranking=0.7119832083465019 from {coleman=0.1, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.15, pop=2.08, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, ari=-0.31, lix=0, time=1.87, numword=0, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=24, rank=38, date=4
Do it anyway.
 ranking=0.6821776944532238 from {coleman=0.2, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.07, pop=1.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.1, ari=-0.21, lix=0, time=1.6, numword=0, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.07}
 orders: orig=31, rank=39, date=10

 ranking=0.323687926833091 from {pop=1.95, coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=1.38, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=27, rank=40, date=15
We all have.. be careful.
 ranking=0.3188814463940548 from {coleman=0.28, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.15, numsent=1, flesch=1.17, ari=-0.09, lix=0, time=0.89, numword=0, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.5}
 orders: orig=10, rank=41, date=26
Why?
 ranking=-0.9883009764547891 from {pop=1.61, coleman=0.1, numsent=1, flesch=0.79, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, ari=-0.34, lix=0, time=0.72, numword=0, kincaid=-0.16, fog=0.02}
 orders: orig=8, rank=42, date=30
Fear Not
 ranking=-2.1246805555555563 from {coleman=0.25, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, ari=-0.19, lix=0, time=0.85, numword=0, kincaid=-0.15, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=28, rank=43, date=27
Post it.
 ranking=-2.5896805555555567 from {coleman=0.1, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.15, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, ari=-0.31, lix=0, time=0.05, numword=0, fuzzy=0.6, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=15, rank=44, date=45
Such as?
 ranking=-2.878569444444445 from {coleman=0.1, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, ari=-0.31, lix=0, time=0.36, numword=0, kincaid=-0.15, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=29, rank=45, date=38

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/17/23 09:30:01: I have just discovered DARPA's "Civil Sanctuary" initiative. This initiative resembles almost ALL of the research re NLP/ ML in my reporting in The Ruby Files.
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Worse 6 of 5 (reached end) 120% 0% 33%
Anomalous elevated replies:
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
  • All of this is just stuff Q covered years ago.
    [original: #5, ranking: #2, date: #1] From @stillwaterlife1 on 02/17/23 09:31:47
Other hidden replies:
  • I do not even know what Q is.
    [original: #6, ranking: #4, date: #3] From @sparklingruby on 02/17/23 09:32:59
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626635600487907337, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 09:32:03 (HIGH,5,28,5,1070) "The Civil Sanctuary Opportunity aims to provide technologies to support a new breed of information environment where positive behavioral norms are encouraged locally in user conversations through the use of AI moderators."]
[tweet: 1626651663653081103, from: @trbwlkrmusic (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:35:52 (HIGH,0,,,55) Was nice knowing ya]
[tweet: 1626668268470558737, from: @auto_walts (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:41:51 (HIGH,0,,,17) Have you seen this. Seems interesting.]
[tweet: 1626661513455886345, from: @mooneyqirl23 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:15:01 (HIGH,0,,,21) [empty]]
[tweet: 1626635532569821187, from: @stillwaterlife1 (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 09:31:47 (LOW,,2,1,55) All of this is just stuff Q covered years ago.]
[tweet: 1626635836526559251, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 09:32:59 (LOW,,1,,56) I do not even know what Q is.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
"The Civil Sanctuary Opportunity aims to provide technologies to support a new breed of information environment where positive behavioral norms are encouraged locally in user conversations through the use of AI moderators."
 ranking=21.230040943048916 from {coleman=0.95, cos=0.42, smog=1.95, jac=0.46, kincaid=1.01, pop=4.57, numsent=1, flesch=1.93, ari=1.12, lix=0.99, time=1.67, numword=3, fuzzy=1, fog=1.21}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=2
All of this is just stuff Q covered years ago.
 ranking=8.643596598692003 from {coleman=0.28, cos=0.43, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.07, pop=2.2, numsent=1, flesch=0.97, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=2, numword=1, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.2}
 orders: orig=5, rank=2, date=1
Have you seen this. Seems interesting.
 ranking=6.760848334620742 from {coleman=0.74, numsent=2, flesch=1.24, cos=0, smog=0.69, ari=0.23, lix=0, time=0.34, numword=0, kincaid=0.17, fuzzy=1, fog=0.4}
 orders: orig=3, rank=3, date=6
I do not even know what Q is.
 ranking=4.921061763893278 from {coleman=-0.01, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.05, pop=0.7, numsent=1, flesch=0.97, ari=-0.25, lix=0, time=1.34, numword=0, fuzzy=0.7, fog=0.16}
 orders: orig=6, rank=4, date=3
Was nice knowing ya 
 ranking=-1.1957875000000002 from {coleman=0.39, numsent=1, flesch=1.03, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, ari=-0.02, lix=0, time=1, numword=0, kincaid=0.04, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=2, rank=5, date=4

 ranking=-2.3333333333333335 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2, smog=0, fww=-5.0, ari=0, lix=0, time=0.67, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=4, rank=6, date=5

@sparklingruby tweeted on 02/16/23 12:22:49: The Ruby Files: Explained #RubyFiles
Status Number of replies Available Suppressed Hidden
Worse 11 of 10 (reached end) 110% 18% 36%
Anomalous elevated replies:
  • Video Source: @RedPill78
    [original: #1, ranking: #11, date: #1] From @sparklingruby on 02/16/23 12:23:21
  • Listening now…
    [original: #3, ranking: #10, date: #4] From @maileprmedia on 02/16/23 12:27:23
Anomalous suppressed/hidden replies:
  • What if the whole scheme was designed to find us and count us? You said yourself that many (most) instances were determined to be non-offenses. Perhaps they weren't really looking for misinformation offenses, but rather THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WERE talking about this? And who.
    [original: #11, ranking: #1, date: #8] From @reardongalt on 02/17/23 11:13:28
  • Expand convo to incl public AI's e.g. chatGPT & dangers for speech/thought diversity. Couldn't attach convo where chatGPT admits it's defense re a controversial subj was based on 3 exceptions & 3 outlier "experts." The chat was deleted by chatGPT, & responses changed on Feb 13.
    [original: #7, ranking: #2, date: #6] From @funva_oped on 02/17/23 01:11:00
  • What do you think happened re Elon and his engineering people when they got their hands on this codebase? Are they aware? Did they already conclude that they'd have to do the whole thing over to fix it? What ARE they working on, if not this?
    [original: #10, ranking: #3, date: #7] From @reardongalt on 02/17/23 10:39:18
Other hidden replies:
  • Hey Kristen, thanks a lot. I am playing with the idea of poisoning my tweets so all of them have to be reviewed. Any suggestions how to reach the threshold with minimal word count?
    [original: #8, ranking: #4, date: #10] From @randomnormii on 02/17/23 12:18:42
  • The language model is already poisoned so not sure adding poisoned tweets will do anything.
    [original: #9, ranking: #6, date: #11] From @sparklingruby on 02/17/23 12:21:55
show
_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 1626316324426117121, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 12:23:21 (HIGH,,2,,490) Video Source: @RedPill78]
[tweet: 1626316571978215424, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/16/23 12:24:20 (HIGH,,5,,922) Sorry that I had to try posting this video 10+ times for it to work.]
[tweet: 1626317338256752642, from: @maileprmedia (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 12:27:23 (HIGH,,3,,133) Listening now…]
[tweet: 1626316402687713283, from: @balddaytrader48 (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 12:23:40 (HIGH,,3,,126) Nothing better than a smart woman!]
[tweet: 1626666475116236800, from: @gzuzgroyp (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:34:44 (HIGH,0,,,8) Language is magic and the magician is hard at work.]
[tweet: 1626431414211313664, from: @manoflamanca (UNKNOWN) on 02/16/23 08:00:41 (HIGH,0,,,50) @elonmusk  When a candidate for Twitter honesty and integrity just presents themself?]
[tweet: 1626509508645101569, from: @funva_oped (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 01:11:00 (HIGH,0,,,35) Expand convo to incl  public AI's e.g. chatGPT & dangers for speech/thought diversity.  Couldn't attach convo where chatGPT admits it's defense re a controversial subj was based on 3 exceptions & 3 outlier "experts." The chat was deleted by chatGPT, & responses changed on Feb 13.]
[tweet: 1626677538595520512, from: @randomnormii (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 12:18:42 (LOW,,,1,6) Hey Kristen, thanks a lot. I am playing with the idea of poisoning my tweets so all of them have to be reviewed. Any suggestions how to reach the threshold with minimal word count?]
[tweet: 1626678351740936192, from: @sparklingruby (VERIFIED) on 02/17/23 12:21:55 (LOW,,,1,4) The language model is already poisoned so not sure adding poisoned tweets will do anything.]
[tweet: 1626652525620514821, from: @reardongalt (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 10:39:18 (LOW,0,,,19) What do you think happened re Elon and his engineering people when they got their hands on this codebase? Are they aware? Did they already conclude that they'd have to do the whole thing over to fix it? What ARE they working on, if not this?]
[tweet: 1626661125390761984, from: @reardongalt (UNKNOWN) on 02/17/23 11:13:28 (LOW,0,,,10) What if the whole scheme was designed to find us and count us? You said yourself that many (most) instances were determined to be non-offenses. Perhaps they weren't really looking for misinformation offenses, but rather THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WERE talking about this? And who.]

rankingFunctionName=formula1

_rankedtweets=
What if the whole scheme was designed to find us and count us? You said yourself that many (most) instances were determined to be non-offenses. Perhaps they weren't really looking for misinformation offenses, but rather THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WERE talking about this? And who.
 ranking=12.385463466596075 from {coleman=0.6, numsent=4, flesch=1.24, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.32, lix=0, time=0.73, numword=4, kincaid=0.27, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=11, rank=1, date=8
Expand convo to incl  public AI's e.g. chatGPT & dangers for speech/thought diversity.

Couldn't attach convo where chatGPT admits it's defense re a controversial subj was based on 3 exceptions & 3 outlier "experts." The chat was deleted by chatGPT, & responses changed on Feb 13.
 ranking=12.316306289609432 from {coleman=0.69, numsent=3, flesch=1.31, cos=0, smog=0.94, ari=0.43, lix=0.08, time=1.1, numword=4, kincaid=0.34, fog=0.47}
 orders: orig=7, rank=2, date=6
What do you think happened re Elon and his engineering people when they got their hands on this codebase? Are they aware? Did they already conclude that they'd have to do the whole thing over to fix it? What ARE they working on, if not this?
 ranking=12.113549521489427 from {coleman=0.43, numsent=4, flesch=1.12, cos=0, smog=0.69, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=0.91, numword=4, kincaid=0.19, fuzzy=0.3, fog=0.32}
 orders: orig=10, rank=3, date=7
Hey Kristen, thanks a lot.
I am playing with the idea of poisoning my tweets so all of them have to be reviewed. Any suggestions how to reach the threshold with minimal word count?
 ranking=11.179172813967785 from {pop=1.61, coleman=0.45, numsent=3, flesch=1.12, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.21, lix=0, time=0.37, numword=3, kincaid=0.19, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=8, rank=4, date=10
@elonmusk

When a candidate for Twitter honesty and integrity just presents themself? 
 ranking=9.328564851059665 from {coleman=0.9, numsent=1, flesch=1.51, cos=0, smog=1.08, ari=0.56, lix=0.99, time=1.28, numword=1, kincaid=0.46, fog=0.59}
 orders: orig=6, rank=5, date=5
The language model is already poisoned so not sure adding poisoned tweets will do anything.
 ranking=8.359901985090781 from {coleman=0.71, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.42, pop=1.61, numsent=1, flesch=1.39, ari=0.5, lix=0.09, time=0.19, numword=1, fuzzy=0.2, fog=0.44}
 orders: orig=9, rank=6, date=11
Sorry that I had to try posting this video 10+ times for it to work.
 ranking=8.108688015071968 from {pop=2.31, coleman=0.27, numsent=1, flesch=1.05, cos=0, smog=0.3, ari=0.12, lix=0, time=1.64, numword=1, kincaid=0.17, fog=0.28}
 orders: orig=2, rank=7, date=3
Nothing better than a smart woman! 
 ranking=7.375799620743207 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0, smog=0.3, kincaid=0.23, pop=1.8, numsent=1, flesch=1.27, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.82, numword=0, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.13}
 orders: orig=4, rank=8, date=2
Language is magic and the magician is hard at work.
 ranking=5.813712102959711 from {coleman=0.42, numsent=1, flesch=1.22, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.15, lix=0, time=0.55, numword=1, kincaid=0.25, fog=0.4}
 orders: orig=5, rank=9, date=9
Listening now…
 ranking=4.985902481278675 from {coleman=0.98, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5.0, kincaid=0.44, pop=1.8, numsent=1, flesch=1.65, ari=0.4, lix=0.1, time=1.46, numword=0, fuzzy=0.3, fog=1.04}
 orders: orig=3, rank=10, date=4
Video Source: @RedPill78
 ranking=1.5771693611198898 from {coleman=0.83, cos=0, smog=0.3, fww=-5.0, kincaid=-0.15, pop=1.39, numsent=1, flesch=0.8, ari=0.28, lix=0, time=2, numword=0, fuzzy=0.1, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=1, rank=11, date=1